ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL: Attorney General Raoul Opposes Rule Change That Endangers Rights of Millions of Workers (IL)

By Press release submission | Jul 1, 2019

Illinois Attorney General issued the following announcement on June 26.

Attorney General Kwame Raoul, as part of a multistate group of 19 attorneys general, opposed the U.S. Department of Labor’s proposal to narrow the interpretation of joint employment, thereby complicating how states enforce labor laws and leaving millions of workers vulnerable to labor violations.

In a letter sent Tuesday to Department of Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta, Raoul and the attorneys general challenge the department’s proposed change to joint employer status under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The joint employment rule determines employer liability for wage theft or other workplace violations when two or more entities jointly employ a worker. Raoul and the attorneys general contend that the department has failed to justify the proposed new interpretation and draws on outdated analysis that does not consider the changing nature of workplace relationships, including the fact that a growing number of businesses are changing organizational models by outsourcing integral functions but still maintaining control of workers.

“When businesses are increasingly using contractors, employments agencies or other third parties to meet staffing needs, workplace protections should be clear,” Raoul said. “I am committed to fighting any policy that could compromise the protections our workers deserve.”

Under the proposed rule, joint employment would be determined by whether an employer hires or fires the employee; supervises and controls the employee’s schedule and working conditions; determines the employee’s rate and method of payment; and maintains the employee’s records. But according to Raoul and the attorneys general, this proposal is inconsistent with the purpose of the FLSA – to protect workers – and ignores more than 30 years of private sector development during which the economy and the workplace have changed.

Further, the attorneys general write that the department’s proposed rule does not reflect workplace relationships, where businesses increasingly share employees using third-party management companies, independent contractors, staffing agencies, or other labor providers. By narrowing the scope of joint employment, the department’s change will leave millions of workers vulnerable to unchecked violations of federal and state labor laws.

(Read More)

Standing up to tax fraud in the construction business (MA)

May 29, 2019
By Steve Joyce
Special to the Reporter

Today, one in five contractors in the construction industry commits tax fraud, resulting in $2.6 billion is lost in federal and state income. That’s why it’s more urgent than ever to combat construction industry tax fraud, an unjust and immoral affront to the people of Massachusetts.

Construction tax fraud often manifests itself through dishonest bookkeeping and worker exploitation. Approximately 1.2 million workers are paid ‘off the books’ in the US annually. Without employment records to hold them accountable, contractors have been known to minimize or steal wages at the completion of a job.

And when a contractor does bother to go through the with paperwork, they frequently misclassify workers as “independent contractors.” The workers do the same job as a fulltime employee, but shoulder tax obligations that the employer should be paying. Nearly 300,000 construction workers are misclassified in this manner each year.

These practices allow contractors to sidestep jobsite safety, skirt around workers compensation premiums, and skip out on payroll taxes and critical benefits like Social Security, overtime, unemployment, and retirement.

In Massachusetts, denied payments and overtime to workers and minimum wage violations cost employees $700 millionannually. In a 2018 fair labor report, the Massachusetts attorney general reported restitution and penalties of $9.6 million as a result of wage theft, worker misclassification, and exploitation of young workers. Construction alone resulted in 61 citations, and generated $1.5 million in restitution and penalties.

Honest employers pay the price of these schemes, too. When shady contractors illegally skip taxes and shortchange workers, the prices they offer look like a 30% savings on labor costs. Businesses that do their work by the book, follow the rules, and pay their fair share of taxes can’t bid competitively with artificially low prices in the marketplace. Cheap, cheating contractors are just like a bag of chips that costs a dollar less but is twice as full of air.

In Massachusetts, recent estimates show that $16.5 million is recovered annually in lost payroll taxes and unemployment insurance. Funds like these contribute to tax pools that eventually help pay for things like public services, meaning when taxes go unpaid, the public is cheated. Workers, business owners, and the people of our state lose out when funding for schools, roads, bridges, first responders, veterans, and Medicaid and Social Security are harmed.

Steve Joyce is the political director of NERCC and a member of Carpenters Local 327. For more information on the New England Council of Carpenters, visit nercc.org or stoptaxfraud.net.

(Read More)

07cb7166-8673-4075-b213-0ffebae896c5

Personal Liability for Prevailing Wage Violations in Massachusetts (MA)

JD Supra
June 18, 2019

Owners of a Massachusetts waste collection, recycling and removal company recently were held personally liable for their failure to pay their employees at prevailing wages. See Donis v. American Waste Services, LLC, 95 Mass.App.Ct. 317 (2019). Under Massachusetts law, wage violations are subject to triple damages and payment of attorney’s fees.

The waste services company entered into contracts with several Massachusetts towns that required compliance with prevailing wage laws at hourly rates of $20 — $24. However, the company paid workers $16 — $17 an hour, or at flat day rates. The company tried several unsuccessful defenses: (1) the towns did not always provide the company with current rate schedules (rejected because the company could obtain them elsewhere); (2) the flat day rates paid to employees properly compensated employees because employees did not always work eight hours (rejected because the company did not keep adequate time records); and (3) employees should not be able to recover for claims under both a prevailing wage claim and a Massachusetts Wage Act claim (rejected because employees can bring both claims).

This case stands as a reminder that companies and their officers must follow prevailing wage laws and failure to do so can result in personal liability for three times the amount of money a company fails to pay its employees.

(Read More)

unnamed

Harvard Labor & Worklife Program Releases Report Detailing State Labor Standards Enforcement Practices to Address Misclassification (MA)

Report details increasing role of state agencies in enforcing misclassification laws and providing worker protections, crucial in era of lax federal enforcement.

by Construction Citizen | June 28, 2019

Researchers from the Harvard Labor & Worklife Program, a program of Harvard Law School, released on Wednesday a report detailing the expanding and increasingly inventive role of state-level agencies regarding enforcement of worker misclassification laws and upholding workers protections. The report, Confronting Misclassification and Payroll Fraud: A Survey of State Labor Standards Enforcement Agencies is published in the midst of a decades-long trend of employers increasingly misclassifying workers as independent contractors. More urgently, within the past two years, the federal government, through the United States Department of Labor and the National Labor Relations Board, has been increasingly rolling back worker protections and enforcement.

Confronting Misclassification and Payroll Fraud, published by Harvard Law School and available at the above link, has found a growing number of innovative practices at the state agency level to combat misclassification and payroll fraud. Among its many findings and recommendations, the report shows:

  • States have focused considerable attention in recent years to addressing misclassification and payroll fraud.
  • Increasingly, states are shifting to more proactive, strategic enforcement models.
  • A number of states have adopted variants of the “ABC” test, a clear and straightforward method of determining whether workers are employees or independent contractors.
  • Many states have established inter-agency task forces to coordinate efforts among agencies charged with enforcement of violations in the areas of wage and hour laws, unemployment insurance, income tax, and workers compensation insurance.

The report also provides recommendations for proper enforcement best practices on a state agency level, including:

  • State agencies should engage in ongoing coordinated, strategic, and proactive enforcement to combat misclassification;
  • Agencies should work closely with unions, community-based organizations, and other stakeholders to help identify and pursue bad actors;
  • More states should adopt legal reforms that have proven useful, including adoption of the ABC test as well as measures to enable joint employer liability;
  • New enforcement strategies are needed as payroll fraud shifts from misclassification to off-the-books or under-the-table cash compensation;
  • Increased publicity by agencies about wrongdoing companies can serve as a powerful deterrent against future misclassification violations;
  • State agencies should work to develop more meaningful metrics to evaluate their effectiveness.

“Employers who misclassify are cheating their workers and gain an unfair advantage over businesses that play by the rules,” said Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey. “I am grateful to the Harvard Labor & Worklife Program for shining a light on this issue. My office will remain committed to combatting wage theft in all its forms.”

(Read More)

(See PDF of Full Report)

Senate gives initial approval to legislation allowing the use of public labor agreements in public works projects (ME)

Pres. Jackson: “This bill marks a step forward for workplace safety, assurance and reliability.”

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 29, 2019

AUGUSTA- The Maine Senate approved a bill from Senate President Troy Jackson, D-Allagash, to allow public authorities to commit to Project Labor Agreements in public works projects an initial vote of 21-13 on Wednesday. The bill – LD 1564, “An Act To Authorize Project Labor Agreements for Public Works Projects” – gives public authorities complete discretion to determine when to enter a Project Labor Agreement on a project-by-project basis.

“Project Labor Agreements represent a win-win for the workers on state projects and the state itself. Not only do PLAs provide uniform wages, benefits, and working conditions, but they also ensure the project will be completed on time and on budget,” said President Jackson. “This bill marks a step forward for workplace safety, assurance and reliability. I’m hopeful the House will join the Senate in passing this bill.”

Pre-agreements help ensure that public works projects are finished in a timely manner, remain on a budget, improve safety and reduce risks of worker misclassification. A pre-agreement can be constructed with a union or private entity. Project Labor Agreements can also include provisions to secure much-needed apprenticeships in the trades. These agreements often include training programs for women, minorities and veterans.

Due to the benefits of Project Labor Agreements, many private sector companies also choose to enter into them. Two high-profile examples include Toyota and Wal-Mart, which have used these agreements for multiple projects.

LD 1564 is supported by the Maine State Building and Construction Trades Council and the Maine AFL-CIO. It will now go before the House for additional votes before returning to the Senate for enactment.

(Read More)

(Copy of Bill)

unnamed

Nessel exploring criminal, civil charges in payroll fraud cases (MN)

By Derek Robertson
July 2, 2019

State Attorney General Dana Nessel announced Tuesday that her office could soon file criminal or civil charges against Michigan businesses accused of payroll fraud.
In a statement, a Nessel spokesperson wrote that by the end of the week her office “will have sent letters demanding business records to at least 10 businesses operating in Michigan and plans to use subpoenas and warrants in other cases to obtain vital information from Michigan-based businesses allegedly operating fraudulent payroll schemes.”

“No family should live in poverty because greedy businesses cheat the system and refuse to play by the rules,” Nessel said in her statement. “This has gone on for far too long and Michigan isn’t going to wait any longer to crack down on these crimes.”

When asked about the 10 businesses in question, Nessel spokesperson Kelly Rossman-McKinney told the Advance that the attorney general and her team are “not naming any names until we take formal action.”

In April, Nessel formed a “Payroll Fraud Enforcement Unit” to investigate claims of such fraud, which usually takes the form of employee misclassification, failure to pay overtime and outright wage theft. Her office said Tuesday that it’s received nearly 100 complaints since its launch.

A 2017 report from the liberal Economic Policy Institute said that between 2013 and 2015, payroll fraud cost Michigan residents more than $400 million. Nessel’s office cites that report and a 2009 study from Michigan State University that reported that misclassification costs the state $107 million a year in revenue through tax fraud.

The attorney general’s office said it’s collaborating in its investigation with the U.S. Department of Labor, the Internal Revenue Service, the Michigan Department of Treasury, the state’s Wage and Hour Bureau and its Unemployment Insurance Agency.

(Read More)

Minneapolis City Council proposes crackdown on wage theft to parallel state law (MN)

The proposal would require employers to put all pay agreements in writing and provide regular written or electronic earnings statements for transparency

By Andy Mannix Star Tribune
JUNE 21, 2019 – 10:07PM

Minneapolis City Council members want to give workers more power to hold their bosses accountable for unpaid wages, following the state’s lead in improving policing of wage theft.

Before a chamber full of workers, some wearing fluorescent orange and yellow vests emblazoned with union logos, Council Members Linea Palmisano, Steve Fletcher and Phillipe Cunningham introduced a proposal Friday that would require employers to put all pay agreements in writing and provide regular written or electronic earnings statements to workers for transparency. A complementary ordinance would expand these protections to freelance workers, such as independent contractors or Uber and Lyft drivers, Fletcher said.

“No matter how people earn their income in the city of Minneapolis, we want to make sure they are paid what they’ve earned,” Fletcher said.

Fletcher praised the lawmakers and organizers who helped push the state law. “Now what we want to do is join the team,” he said.

In Minneapolis, low-wage workers of color are particularly affected by this practice, according to the ordinance authors.

Veronica Mendez Moore, co-director of Centro de Trabajadores Unidos en Lucha, said her organization has been working on the issue of wage theft for more than a decade.

The new rules would provide additional protections from retaliatory employers and create a streamlined system that allows workers to recoup wages without an attorney. Those who don’t follow the rules could face a misdemeanor charge and an escalating series of fines.

The ordinance is still in draft form, but authors say the law would likely apply to any employees who spend 80 hours per year working in Minneapolis.

(Read More)

Minnesota Wage Theft Bill with New Employer Requirements Takes Effect July 1 (MN)

JD Supra
June 12, 2019

In one of the most significant pieces of legislation affecting employers in many years, the Minnesota Legislature passed, and Governor Walz signed, the Jobs and Economic Development Omnibus bill that includes new wage theft protections for employees and new requirements for employers. The wage theft bill is one of the few pieces of bipartisan employment legislation that survived the 2019 legislative session. The law constitutes a very significant change in wage payment requirements and enforcement. It includes increased civil enforcement and recordkeeping requirements for employers, as well as new criminal penalties for intentional wage theft. These changes will go into effect on July 1, 2019.

What is Wage Theft?

The Omnibus bill includes two separate areas of enforcement. The first area concerns civil enforcement of wage payments. It increases the penalties for failure to pay wages and creates certain notice and recordkeeping requirements. The second area concerns criminal penalties for intentional wage theft. While both areas are referred to colloquially as wage theft, the statutory definition of wage theft applies only to intentional wage theft under the criminal statute. The law, however, increases potential exposure for employers that do not pay employees properly.

Civil Enforcement

The bill allocates over $2 million annually to civil enforcement of wage theft issues through the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry and the Attorney General’s Office. It provides greater enforcement mechanisms including the authority to inspect places of employment “without unreasonable delay” and gives the Commissioner of Labor the ability to obtain an inspection order from the court if the employer refuses. It also makes it a misdemeanor to hinder or delay the Commissioner in the performance of his duties.

The new law gives the Commissioner the right to interview non-management employees in private regarding matters under investigation. It also increases the penalty for repeat failures to provide the records required by the Department of Labor to $5,000 per repeated failure. The law gives the Department the ability to share data with other public agencies, including licensing agencies. The data sharing will likely have implications for government contractors that run afoul of these new requirements. Finally, the law includes a retaliation prohibition, which includes a private right to bring a lawsuit, as well as a civil penalty in an amount between $700 and $3,000 per violation.

Timing of Payment of Wages

The law amends Minnesota Statute § 181.101 regarding the timing of wage payments. The statute now explicitly includes salary, earnings, and gratuities within the types of wages that must be paid at least once every 31 days. The law also states that all commission earned by an employee must be paid at least once every three months. The law removes the 15-day cap on penalties for late payment of wages. The law now explicitly includes commissions in the types of wages that may be demanded for payment; if the commission is not paid within 10 days of a demand for payment, the Department may charge and collect the commission earned along with a penalty equal to 1/15 of the commissions earned but unpaid for each day beyond the 10-day limit.

Notice and Recordkeeping Requirements

The law requires that employers include additional information in the earning statements provided to employees at the end of each pay period. In addition to the information previously required under Minnesota Statute § 181.032, employers must now also include 1) the rate or rates of pay including the basis of that rate, i.e., whether the employee is paid hourly, by shift, day, week, salary, piece, commission, or other method; 2) allowances claimed pursuant to permitted meals and lodging; 3) the physical address of the employer’s main office or principal place of business including a mailing address if different; and 4) the employer’s telephone number.

(Read More)

Missouri releases first prevailing wage rates following 2018 overhaul (MO)

Alisha Shurr
July 3, 2019

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. – Following a sweeping overhaul of the prevailing wage system last year, Missouri has set the first rates under the alterations.

On Wednesday, the Missouri Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (DOLIR) announced the prevailing wage rates for FY 2020 and are now in effect for use on all Missouri public works construction projects.

During the 2018 regular session, the Missouri General Assembly gave its stamp of approval to HB 1729, championed by GOP Rep. Jeffrey Justus, after hours of debate and compromise.

The compromised language was not a total repeal, as was originally proposed, but instead laid out more specific criteria for the calculations used to decide the prevailing wage.

One provision states if there are less than 1,000 reportable hours for an occupation in that locality, the public works contracting minimum wage would be equal to 120 percent of the average hourly wage in a particular locality.

The reason for this, according to supporters, was heavily populated areas, such as St. Louis County or Jackson County, were dictating the wages in nearby rural areas. The intent of the provision was to make the wages more reflective of their respective localities.

The changes do not impact projects worth less than $75,000.

Under the prevailing wage in effect, a carpenter in Jefferson County would earn $54.69 an hour while a carpenter in Macon County, where less than 1,000 hours were reported, would earn $18.78 an hour.

The Annual Wage Order contains prevailing wage rates for each occupational title in each county and the city of St. Louis. The prevailing wage is the minimum rate that must be paid to workers on public works construction projects in Missouri, such as bridges, roads, schools, and government buildings.

Additionally, the Division of Labor Standards provided the General Wage Order to the Missouri State Highways and Transportation Commission that lists the prevailing wage rates for construction projects by the Missouri Department of Transportation.

DOLIR’s Division of Labor Standards is responsible for gathering wage information from public and private commercial construction projects statewide on an ongoing basis from contractors. The wage information is used to determine wage rates for each of the 20 different occupational titles for every Missouri county and the city of St. Louis.

Annual Wage Order No. 26 is now in effect and is available at labor.mo.gov/prevailing-wage. Public works contractors and public bodies are advised to contact the Division of Labor Standards for additional questions or information via email at prevailingwage@labor.mo.gov or by phone at 573-751-3403.

(See Article)

Man defrauds feds $346M through sham construction firms (MO)

Author – Kim Slowey
Published – June 6, 2019

Dive Brief:
-The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Missouri announced June 3 that a Kansas contractor has pleaded guilty to defrauding the federal government by bidding on and accepting payment for construction contracts set aside for small businesses and for service-disabled veterans and minorities. Through two sham companies, Olathe, Kansas, contractor Matthew McPherson and his co-conspirators received a total of $346 million through more than 200 federal set-aside contracts.

-Prosecutors said McPherson set up the first sham company, Zieson Construction Co., in July 2009 with African-American and service-disabled veteran Stephon Ziegler, who served as a figurehead while McPherson and others actually ran and profited from the ill-gotten projects. Then, in 2014, McPherson and a Zieson employee created another company, Simcon Corp., to bid on work intended for small businesses after Zieson grew too big to do so. Zieson and Simcon shared office space, equipment and other resources.

-McPherson faces up to five years in prison with no possibility of parole, and would have to forfeit more than $5.5 million in fraud proceeds. Ziegler pleaded guilty to making a false statement to the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs.

Dive Insight:

Even though Ziegler was qualified to enter into those federal set-aside contracts, he didn’t run the day-to-day operations of Zieson nor did he wield significant control over deciding which projects to bid on or what subcontractors and material suppliers to use, which is also a condition of doing work with the federal government as a minority, service-disabled or certified small business. This same goes for contracts set aside for women-owned businesses.

And whether it’s due to a shortage of qualified firms or just plain greed, contractors continue to get caught trying to fake their way through the set-aside requirements of publicly funded work.

Nichter Construction Inc of New York, for instance, pleaded guilty in February to making false statements about minority participation on the $350,000 renovation of a Buffalo, New York, psychiatric facility. Nichter hired all non-minority subcontractors for the project, even though it carried a 13% minority requirement. Instead, Nichter engaged a minority contractor to falsely assert that it had performed work on the project. Nichter faces a maximum fine of $10,000.

(Read More)