unnamed

Harvard Labor & Worklife Program Releases Report Detailing State Labor Standards Enforcement Practices to Address Misclassification (MA)

Report details increasing role of state agencies in enforcing misclassification laws and providing worker protections, crucial in era of lax federal enforcement.

by Construction Citizen | June 28, 2019

Researchers from the Harvard Labor & Worklife Program, a program of Harvard Law School, released on Wednesday a report detailing the expanding and increasingly inventive role of state-level agencies regarding enforcement of worker misclassification laws and upholding workers protections. The report, Confronting Misclassification and Payroll Fraud: A Survey of State Labor Standards Enforcement Agencies is published in the midst of a decades-long trend of employers increasingly misclassifying workers as independent contractors. More urgently, within the past two years, the federal government, through the United States Department of Labor and the National Labor Relations Board, has been increasingly rolling back worker protections and enforcement.

Confronting Misclassification and Payroll Fraud, published by Harvard Law School and available at the above link, has found a growing number of innovative practices at the state agency level to combat misclassification and payroll fraud. Among its many findings and recommendations, the report shows:

  • States have focused considerable attention in recent years to addressing misclassification and payroll fraud.
  • Increasingly, states are shifting to more proactive, strategic enforcement models.
  • A number of states have adopted variants of the “ABC” test, a clear and straightforward method of determining whether workers are employees or independent contractors.
  • Many states have established inter-agency task forces to coordinate efforts among agencies charged with enforcement of violations in the areas of wage and hour laws, unemployment insurance, income tax, and workers compensation insurance.

The report also provides recommendations for proper enforcement best practices on a state agency level, including:

  • State agencies should engage in ongoing coordinated, strategic, and proactive enforcement to combat misclassification;
  • Agencies should work closely with unions, community-based organizations, and other stakeholders to help identify and pursue bad actors;
  • More states should adopt legal reforms that have proven useful, including adoption of the ABC test as well as measures to enable joint employer liability;
  • New enforcement strategies are needed as payroll fraud shifts from misclassification to off-the-books or under-the-table cash compensation;
  • Increased publicity by agencies about wrongdoing companies can serve as a powerful deterrent against future misclassification violations;
  • State agencies should work to develop more meaningful metrics to evaluate their effectiveness.

“Employers who misclassify are cheating their workers and gain an unfair advantage over businesses that play by the rules,” said Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey. “I am grateful to the Harvard Labor & Worklife Program for shining a light on this issue. My office will remain committed to combatting wage theft in all its forms.”

(Read More)

(See PDF of Full Report)

Senate gives initial approval to legislation allowing the use of public labor agreements in public works projects (ME)

Pres. Jackson: “This bill marks a step forward for workplace safety, assurance and reliability.”

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 29, 2019

AUGUSTA- The Maine Senate approved a bill from Senate President Troy Jackson, D-Allagash, to allow public authorities to commit to Project Labor Agreements in public works projects an initial vote of 21-13 on Wednesday. The bill – LD 1564, “An Act To Authorize Project Labor Agreements for Public Works Projects” – gives public authorities complete discretion to determine when to enter a Project Labor Agreement on a project-by-project basis.

“Project Labor Agreements represent a win-win for the workers on state projects and the state itself. Not only do PLAs provide uniform wages, benefits, and working conditions, but they also ensure the project will be completed on time and on budget,” said President Jackson. “This bill marks a step forward for workplace safety, assurance and reliability. I’m hopeful the House will join the Senate in passing this bill.”

Pre-agreements help ensure that public works projects are finished in a timely manner, remain on a budget, improve safety and reduce risks of worker misclassification. A pre-agreement can be constructed with a union or private entity. Project Labor Agreements can also include provisions to secure much-needed apprenticeships in the trades. These agreements often include training programs for women, minorities and veterans.

Due to the benefits of Project Labor Agreements, many private sector companies also choose to enter into them. Two high-profile examples include Toyota and Wal-Mart, which have used these agreements for multiple projects.

LD 1564 is supported by the Maine State Building and Construction Trades Council and the Maine AFL-CIO. It will now go before the House for additional votes before returning to the Senate for enactment.

(Read More)

(Copy of Bill)

unnamed

Nessel exploring criminal, civil charges in payroll fraud cases (MN)

By Derek Robertson
July 2, 2019

State Attorney General Dana Nessel announced Tuesday that her office could soon file criminal or civil charges against Michigan businesses accused of payroll fraud.
In a statement, a Nessel spokesperson wrote that by the end of the week her office “will have sent letters demanding business records to at least 10 businesses operating in Michigan and plans to use subpoenas and warrants in other cases to obtain vital information from Michigan-based businesses allegedly operating fraudulent payroll schemes.”

“No family should live in poverty because greedy businesses cheat the system and refuse to play by the rules,” Nessel said in her statement. “This has gone on for far too long and Michigan isn’t going to wait any longer to crack down on these crimes.”

When asked about the 10 businesses in question, Nessel spokesperson Kelly Rossman-McKinney told the Advance that the attorney general and her team are “not naming any names until we take formal action.”

In April, Nessel formed a “Payroll Fraud Enforcement Unit” to investigate claims of such fraud, which usually takes the form of employee misclassification, failure to pay overtime and outright wage theft. Her office said Tuesday that it’s received nearly 100 complaints since its launch.

A 2017 report from the liberal Economic Policy Institute said that between 2013 and 2015, payroll fraud cost Michigan residents more than $400 million. Nessel’s office cites that report and a 2009 study from Michigan State University that reported that misclassification costs the state $107 million a year in revenue through tax fraud.

The attorney general’s office said it’s collaborating in its investigation with the U.S. Department of Labor, the Internal Revenue Service, the Michigan Department of Treasury, the state’s Wage and Hour Bureau and its Unemployment Insurance Agency.

(Read More)

Minneapolis City Council proposes crackdown on wage theft to parallel state law (MN)

The proposal would require employers to put all pay agreements in writing and provide regular written or electronic earnings statements for transparency

By Andy Mannix Star Tribune
JUNE 21, 2019 – 10:07PM

Minneapolis City Council members want to give workers more power to hold their bosses accountable for unpaid wages, following the state’s lead in improving policing of wage theft.

Before a chamber full of workers, some wearing fluorescent orange and yellow vests emblazoned with union logos, Council Members Linea Palmisano, Steve Fletcher and Phillipe Cunningham introduced a proposal Friday that would require employers to put all pay agreements in writing and provide regular written or electronic earnings statements to workers for transparency. A complementary ordinance would expand these protections to freelance workers, such as independent contractors or Uber and Lyft drivers, Fletcher said.

“No matter how people earn their income in the city of Minneapolis, we want to make sure they are paid what they’ve earned,” Fletcher said.

Fletcher praised the lawmakers and organizers who helped push the state law. “Now what we want to do is join the team,” he said.

In Minneapolis, low-wage workers of color are particularly affected by this practice, according to the ordinance authors.

Veronica Mendez Moore, co-director of Centro de Trabajadores Unidos en Lucha, said her organization has been working on the issue of wage theft for more than a decade.

The new rules would provide additional protections from retaliatory employers and create a streamlined system that allows workers to recoup wages without an attorney. Those who don’t follow the rules could face a misdemeanor charge and an escalating series of fines.

The ordinance is still in draft form, but authors say the law would likely apply to any employees who spend 80 hours per year working in Minneapolis.

(Read More)

Minnesota Wage Theft Bill with New Employer Requirements Takes Effect July 1 (MN)

JD Supra
June 12, 2019

In one of the most significant pieces of legislation affecting employers in many years, the Minnesota Legislature passed, and Governor Walz signed, the Jobs and Economic Development Omnibus bill that includes new wage theft protections for employees and new requirements for employers. The wage theft bill is one of the few pieces of bipartisan employment legislation that survived the 2019 legislative session. The law constitutes a very significant change in wage payment requirements and enforcement. It includes increased civil enforcement and recordkeeping requirements for employers, as well as new criminal penalties for intentional wage theft. These changes will go into effect on July 1, 2019.

What is Wage Theft?

The Omnibus bill includes two separate areas of enforcement. The first area concerns civil enforcement of wage payments. It increases the penalties for failure to pay wages and creates certain notice and recordkeeping requirements. The second area concerns criminal penalties for intentional wage theft. While both areas are referred to colloquially as wage theft, the statutory definition of wage theft applies only to intentional wage theft under the criminal statute. The law, however, increases potential exposure for employers that do not pay employees properly.

Civil Enforcement

The bill allocates over $2 million annually to civil enforcement of wage theft issues through the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry and the Attorney General’s Office. It provides greater enforcement mechanisms including the authority to inspect places of employment “without unreasonable delay” and gives the Commissioner of Labor the ability to obtain an inspection order from the court if the employer refuses. It also makes it a misdemeanor to hinder or delay the Commissioner in the performance of his duties.

The new law gives the Commissioner the right to interview non-management employees in private regarding matters under investigation. It also increases the penalty for repeat failures to provide the records required by the Department of Labor to $5,000 per repeated failure. The law gives the Department the ability to share data with other public agencies, including licensing agencies. The data sharing will likely have implications for government contractors that run afoul of these new requirements. Finally, the law includes a retaliation prohibition, which includes a private right to bring a lawsuit, as well as a civil penalty in an amount between $700 and $3,000 per violation.

Timing of Payment of Wages

The law amends Minnesota Statute § 181.101 regarding the timing of wage payments. The statute now explicitly includes salary, earnings, and gratuities within the types of wages that must be paid at least once every 31 days. The law also states that all commission earned by an employee must be paid at least once every three months. The law removes the 15-day cap on penalties for late payment of wages. The law now explicitly includes commissions in the types of wages that may be demanded for payment; if the commission is not paid within 10 days of a demand for payment, the Department may charge and collect the commission earned along with a penalty equal to 1/15 of the commissions earned but unpaid for each day beyond the 10-day limit.

Notice and Recordkeeping Requirements

The law requires that employers include additional information in the earning statements provided to employees at the end of each pay period. In addition to the information previously required under Minnesota Statute § 181.032, employers must now also include 1) the rate or rates of pay including the basis of that rate, i.e., whether the employee is paid hourly, by shift, day, week, salary, piece, commission, or other method; 2) allowances claimed pursuant to permitted meals and lodging; 3) the physical address of the employer’s main office or principal place of business including a mailing address if different; and 4) the employer’s telephone number.

(Read More)

Missouri releases first prevailing wage rates following 2018 overhaul (MO)

Alisha Shurr
July 3, 2019

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. – Following a sweeping overhaul of the prevailing wage system last year, Missouri has set the first rates under the alterations.

On Wednesday, the Missouri Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (DOLIR) announced the prevailing wage rates for FY 2020 and are now in effect for use on all Missouri public works construction projects.

During the 2018 regular session, the Missouri General Assembly gave its stamp of approval to HB 1729, championed by GOP Rep. Jeffrey Justus, after hours of debate and compromise.

The compromised language was not a total repeal, as was originally proposed, but instead laid out more specific criteria for the calculations used to decide the prevailing wage.

One provision states if there are less than 1,000 reportable hours for an occupation in that locality, the public works contracting minimum wage would be equal to 120 percent of the average hourly wage in a particular locality.

The reason for this, according to supporters, was heavily populated areas, such as St. Louis County or Jackson County, were dictating the wages in nearby rural areas. The intent of the provision was to make the wages more reflective of their respective localities.

The changes do not impact projects worth less than $75,000.

Under the prevailing wage in effect, a carpenter in Jefferson County would earn $54.69 an hour while a carpenter in Macon County, where less than 1,000 hours were reported, would earn $18.78 an hour.

The Annual Wage Order contains prevailing wage rates for each occupational title in each county and the city of St. Louis. The prevailing wage is the minimum rate that must be paid to workers on public works construction projects in Missouri, such as bridges, roads, schools, and government buildings.

Additionally, the Division of Labor Standards provided the General Wage Order to the Missouri State Highways and Transportation Commission that lists the prevailing wage rates for construction projects by the Missouri Department of Transportation.

DOLIR’s Division of Labor Standards is responsible for gathering wage information from public and private commercial construction projects statewide on an ongoing basis from contractors. The wage information is used to determine wage rates for each of the 20 different occupational titles for every Missouri county and the city of St. Louis.

Annual Wage Order No. 26 is now in effect and is available at labor.mo.gov/prevailing-wage. Public works contractors and public bodies are advised to contact the Division of Labor Standards for additional questions or information via email at prevailingwage@labor.mo.gov or by phone at 573-751-3403.

(See Article)

Man defrauds feds $346M through sham construction firms (MO)

Author – Kim Slowey
Published – June 6, 2019

Dive Brief:
-The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Missouri announced June 3 that a Kansas contractor has pleaded guilty to defrauding the federal government by bidding on and accepting payment for construction contracts set aside for small businesses and for service-disabled veterans and minorities. Through two sham companies, Olathe, Kansas, contractor Matthew McPherson and his co-conspirators received a total of $346 million through more than 200 federal set-aside contracts.

-Prosecutors said McPherson set up the first sham company, Zieson Construction Co., in July 2009 with African-American and service-disabled veteran Stephon Ziegler, who served as a figurehead while McPherson and others actually ran and profited from the ill-gotten projects. Then, in 2014, McPherson and a Zieson employee created another company, Simcon Corp., to bid on work intended for small businesses after Zieson grew too big to do so. Zieson and Simcon shared office space, equipment and other resources.

-McPherson faces up to five years in prison with no possibility of parole, and would have to forfeit more than $5.5 million in fraud proceeds. Ziegler pleaded guilty to making a false statement to the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs.

Dive Insight:

Even though Ziegler was qualified to enter into those federal set-aside contracts, he didn’t run the day-to-day operations of Zieson nor did he wield significant control over deciding which projects to bid on or what subcontractors and material suppliers to use, which is also a condition of doing work with the federal government as a minority, service-disabled or certified small business. This same goes for contracts set aside for women-owned businesses.

And whether it’s due to a shortage of qualified firms or just plain greed, contractors continue to get caught trying to fake their way through the set-aside requirements of publicly funded work.

Nichter Construction Inc of New York, for instance, pleaded guilty in February to making false statements about minority participation on the $350,000 renovation of a Buffalo, New York, psychiatric facility. Nichter hired all non-minority subcontractors for the project, even though it carried a 13% minority requirement. Instead, Nichter engaged a minority contractor to falsely assert that it had performed work on the project. Nichter faces a maximum fine of $10,000.

(Read More)

Sweeney Urges Follow Through on Effort to Prevent Misclassification of Workers (NJ)

June 11, 2019, 10:40 am
Insider NJ

Trenton – The year-long wait for action by the task force established by the governor to stop the misclassification of workers has allowed unscrupulous developers and contractors to continue to ignore the labor laws intended to protect workers’ rights.

In May of 2018, Governor Murphy signed an executive order establishing the Task Force on Employee Misclassification to investigate employee misclassification and develop recommendations to enforce compliance with the laws “ensuring adequate workplace protections and providing employment-related benefits like unemployment insurance and workers’ compensation.”

To date, the task force has failed to produce any public results.

“The construction industry has been plagued by the dishonest and illegal actions of unscrupulous developers and contractors and we are all paying the price,” said Senator Sweeney (D-Gloucester/Salem/Cumberland). “The misclassification of workers has resulted in wage theft, off-the-books payments, underfunding workers’ compensation and avoiding taxes. They are exploiting workers for their own gain.”

Employers often misclassify their employees intentionally in order to reduce labor costs, avoid paying state and federal taxes, and boost their own profits.

“Protecting workers’ rights is an important function of government and there should be follow through on the intended work of the task force,” said Senator Sweeney. “During this delay, workers are losing benefits, wages and other compensation. It should be brought to an end.”

(See Article)

07cb7166-8673-4075-b213-0ffebae896c5

Troy Singleton offers possible compromise on tax incentives (NJ)

In a statement released last week, the Burlington County Democrat put forward a framework for a potential compromise that would allow the existing incentives programs to remain in place but with several reforms designed to make them more transparent and accountable.

By David Levinsky
Posted Jun 24, 2019 at 4:22 PM

TRENTON – The dispute over New Jersey’s soon-to-expire tax incentives programs has been described as a political “death match” with billions in tax revenues and the revitalization of one of the state’s poorest cities hanging in the balance.

On one side is Gov. Phil Murphy and progressive groups who argue the current incentive programs are too rich and overused and should be scrapped and replaced with new ones that are capped and targeted toward businesses in growing sectors and startups.

Opposing them are state lawmakers and business groups who want to keep the existing incentives, which they say have proven to be critical for bringing or keeping businesses in New Jersey, particularly the city of Camden and South Jersey counties like Burlington.

So far there has been little common ground between the feuding factions or willingness to compromise.

State Sen. Troy Singleton, D-7th of Delran, wants that to change.

In a statement released last week, the Burlington County Democrat put forward a framework for a potential compromise that would allow the existing incentives programs to remain in place but with several reforms designed to make them more transparent and accountable.

“Those of us who believe that our tax code can be responsibly used to spur the economy and jobs can also fight for accountability, transparency and a results-based program,” Singleton said, listing potential reforms to the existing Grow New Jersey and the Economic Redevelopment and Growth incentives programs.

Grow New Jersey is used to lure and retain businesses and promote job creation, and the Economic Redevelopment and Growth program is designed to reward developers who build in desired locations.

(Read More)

dispatcher-12

New Jersey Workers, Advocates Celebrate Passage of Landmark Anti-Wage Theft Legislation (NJ)

New Jersey Workers, Advocates Celebrate Passage of Landmark
Anti-Wage Theft Legislation

A2903/S1790 Catapults New Jersey to One of the Strongest Wage and Hour laws in the Country in Advance of the July 1st Minimum Wage Hike

INSIDER NJ
June 27, 2019, 4:15 pm

(Trenton, NJ) June 27, 2019: Today, both houses of the New Jersey State legislature passed a landmark anti-wage theft bill (A-2903 / S-1790), sending the legislation to Governor Phil Murphy’s desk. When signed into law, New Jersey’s wage and hour protections will be among the strongest in the country, just in time for the state’s minimum wage hike this July 1st.

The legislation enhances enforcement of state wage and hour laws, ensuring that workers are paid according to the law. Under the legislation, employers that violate wage and hour laws by not paying minimum wage, overtime or failing to pay for hours worked could liable for treble damages and fines. The bill also extends the statute of limitations from two to six years, strengthens joint employer liability where firms use subcontractors, and strengthens anti-retaliation provisions to protect employees who speak out against wage and hour violations.

“For low wage workers, like myself, passing the anti-wage theft bill has been just as important as increasing the minimum wage, because it means workers will actually receive the pay we have rightfully earned. Unscrupulous employers will no longer be rewarded by our laws for not paying workers. On behalf of Make the Road New Jersey, I would like to express our gratitude to Assemblywoman Quijano and Senator Weinberg for their years of commitment to ensuring the anti-wage theft bill becomes law” said Roberto Sanchez, a member of Make the Road New Jersey, a community-based immigrant and workers rights organization based in Elizabeth and Passaic.

“After years of advocacy, we are thrilled that New Jersey will have one of the strongest anti-wage theft law in the nation to protect workers against wage theft while creating a level playing field for employers that do right by their workers,” said Reynalda Cruz, a leader of New Labor, a workers’ center in based in Newark, New Brunswick, and Lakewood.

(Read More)