State labor official criticizes U.S. Supreme Court decision

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on
Avakian says workers and businesses will be hurt by the use of arbitration clauses in employment contracts to bar workers from joining class-action lawsuits over workplace issues. High court voted 5-4 to side with the prohibition.

Peter Wong, Tuesday, May 22, 2018

State Labor Commissioner Brad Avakian says a U.S. Supreme Court decision will prove troublesome to businesses, not just workers.

“That was an absurd decision,” Avakian said Monday, May 21.

Avakian’s reference was to a 5-4 decision, which the Supreme Court issued Monday in three consolidated cases, that allow businesses to use arbitration clauses in employment contracts to bar workers from joining class-action lawsuits over workplace issues.

Under arbitration, a third party settles the dispute – and there is usually no alternative resolution.

The decision affects an estimated 25 million employment contracts.

“Arbitration agreements limit people’s ability to go to court if they want a jury trial,” Avakian said. “That was a strike against workers.”

The court ruled in a 2011 case that businesses can invoke arbitration clauses to bar consumers from filing class-action suits.

But in two of the three cases brought to the high court – all of them arguing that workers were underpaid – federal appeals courts ruled in favor of allowing class-action suits on wages and working conditions. One appeals court, however, did not – and the conflicting rulings prompted the high court to act.

Now individual workers will have to file separate lawsuits.

“For employees, class-action suits do not put all the burden of financing or supporting a case on one individual who might be going after a giant corporation,” Avakian said. “It balances the power by letting employees join together and carry the burden.”

(Read More)

Editorial: After Supreme Court decision, Congress must preserve workers’ right to sue

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

Los Angeles Times May 22, 2018

A divided Supreme Court undercut American workers on Monday, ruling that employers can bar employees from bringing class-action lawsuits over wage and workplace disputes.

The court held in Epic Systems Corp. vs. Lewis that the right to collective actions guaranteed by the National Labor Relations Act does not bar employers from requiring disputes to be resolved individually through arbitration, as provided by the Federal Arbitration Act.

“As a matter of policy these questions are surely debatable,” Justice Neil M. Gorsuch wrote for the majority. “But as a matter of law the answer is clear.”

Whether the court’s decision is sound law is an argument for those versed in the fine details of statute and precedent. But mandatory arbitration is bad policy, and bad for workers.

Congress should step in restore workers’ ability to seek redress in the courts – either individually or as a group – rather than let bosses bar the door to the courthouse.

According to the Economic Policy Institute, some 60 million nonunionized private-sector employees work under agreements that preclude them from suing their employers over workplace disputes.

Arbitration can be a useful way of resolving a conflict without the expense and time investment of going through the courts.

But arbitration agreements are fair only if the two sides entering into them do so willingly and on equal footing.

If employers routinely force applicants to sign away the right to sue in order to get hired, then the two sides are clearly not entering arbitration willingly or as equals.

And studies have found that workers win arbitration cases at lower rates than they do court cases.

(Read More)

These U.S. Workers Are Being Paid Like It’s the 1980s

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

In some parts of America, the Department of Labor hasn’t updated its “prevailing wage” for taxpayer-funded work in decades.

By Josh Eidelson
May 25, 2018, 4:00 AM EDT

Thanks to a web of loopholes and limits, the federal government has been green-lighting hourly pay of just $7.25 for some construction workers laboring on taxpayer-funded projects, despite decades-old laws that promise them the “prevailing wage.”

Over the past year, the U.S. Department of Labor has formally given approval for contractors to pay $7.25 for specific government-funded projects in six Texas counties, according to letters reviewed by Bloomberg. Those counties are among dozens around the nation where the government-calculated prevailing wage listed for certain work-like some carpenters in North Carolina, bulldozer operators in Kansas and cement masons in Nebraska-is just the minimum wage.

That’s in part because, according to publicly available data from the Labor Department’s Wage and Hour Division, the agency is relying on wage survey data in more than 50 jurisdictions that’s from the 1980s or earlier. Experts said that’s a far cry from what Congress intended when, starting with the Depression-era Davis Bacon Act, it passed a series of laws meant to ensure that private companies contracted for government-backed projects pay their workers at least in the vicinity of what others get for the same work in the same geographic area.

In an emailed statement, the Labor Department didn’t address whether the decades-old data is a problem.

“The Wage and Hour Division carefully plans where to survey on an annual basis to ensure that prevailing wage rates reflect the reality of construction pay practices in a locality. The division identifies potential survey areas based on a number of criteria, including where available data on active construction projects in an area reveal changes in local pay practices such that a survey is necessary,” the department said.

Because government contracts are often required to go to the “lowest responsible bidder,” supporters say prevailing wage rules prevent a “race to the bottom” in which exploitative companies who pay workers less outbid safer, higher-quality firms, and in turn drive down industry standards to pocket more taxpayer dollars. Opponents of prevailing wage rules counter that they’re intrusive mandates that waste money, inflating construction costs in order to help unionized firms beat non-union competitors.

(Read More)

NABTU STATEMENT ON ADMINISTRATION’S EFFORTS TO EXPAND APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on
NABTU Statement on Administration’s Efforts to Expand Apprenticeship Training

Published: Monday, 21 May 2018 15:32
May 10, 2018

WASHINGTON, DC – North America’s Building Trades Unions (NABTU) today issued the following statement in response to the Administration’s efforts to expand apprenticeship into new industries:

“NABTU supports the Administration’s efforts to expand apprenticeship into industries that currently lack this important form of workforce training. As an industry with over 100 years of experience in establishing a world-class apprenticeship and training infrastructure, we know first-hand that high quality, registered apprenticeship programs provide reliable pathways to middle class careers and long-term economic security. The hundreds of thousands of hardworking American men and women in the building and construction industry can attest to this.

“NABTU appreciates and welcomes the continued opportunity to impart our experience and expertise on successful apprenticeship models. We will remain fully engaged in the establishment of “Industry Regulated Apprenticeship Programs” to ensure rigor and quality while mitigating any potential negative impacts to the apprenticeship brand – especially to NABTU and our contractor partners’ $1 billion collectively bargained investment in construction apprenticeship training.

“In 2017, the U.S. Department of Labor reported that there were 190,000 new apprentices nationwide – across all sectors of the economy. Of that total, NABTU is proud that one-third of these new apprentices began their training in our joint labor-management training programs in the construction industry – a longstanding partnership between our unions and our contractor partners.”

ABOUT NORTH AMERICA’S BUILDING TRADES UNIONS

North America’s Building Trades Unions is an alliance of 14 national and international unions in the building and construction industry that collectively represent over 3 million skilled craft professionals in the United States and Canada. Each year, our unions and our signatory contractor partners invest over $1 billion in private sector money to fund and operate over 1,900 apprenticeship training and education facilities across North America that produce the safest, most highly trained, and productive skilled craft workers found anywhere in the world.

(Read More)

New Jersey Passes Laws on Sick Leave and Pay Equity; Will Tackle Worker Misclassification (NJ)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

The National Law Review
Wednesday, May 9, 2018

A little more than 100 days into his tenure, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy has made it clear that employment is one of his top priorities. In the past two weeks, Gov. Murphy has signed a Paid Sick Leave and an Equal Pay bill into law and established a Task Force on Employee Misclassification.

Paid Sick Leave

The New Jersey Paid Sick Leave Act was signed into law on May 2, 2018, and takes effect on October 29, 2018. It will require New Jersey employers of all sizes to offer their employees one hour of sick leave for every 30 hours worked. Covered employees will be eligible for paid sick leave after 120 days of employment and are then permitted to use up to 40 hours of sick leave per benefit year. Employers may set the benefit year. The benefit year does not need to be a calendar year but once set, it cannot be changed without prior notification to the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development. In lieu of tracking each hour worked and earned, employers may offer 40 hours of paid sick time at the beginning of each benefit year or utilize an existing paid-time-off policy so long as it confers equal or richer paid leave benefits than those provided for in the Act.

…

The Equal Pay Act

The Diane B. Allen Equal Pay Act (NJEPA), signed into law by the Gov. Murphy last month, will take effect in less than four weeks – on July 1, 2018. New Jersey employers across industries should pay close attention to this effective date because the law places onerous requirements on them. The NJEPA contains extensive amendments to the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD) through its:

  • Prohibition of compensation discrimination on the basis of any protected class for “substantially similar work when viewed as a composite of skill, effort, and responsibilities”
  • Increased statute of limitations period from two to six years for claims alleging pay inequity or discrimination
  • Mandatory treble damages for successful plaintiffs

Task Force on Employee Misclassification

On May 3, 2018, Gov. Murphy signed an executive order establishing a Task Force on Employee Misclassification. Misclassification is when workers are incorrectly labeled as independent contractors rather than employees. Workers who are incorrectly classified frequently are not provided benefits and other protections available to employees, such as minimum wage, overtime compensation, family and medical leave, unemployment insurance, and workers’ compensation.

The New Jersey Task Force will be charged with a number of responsibilities to combat employee misclassification, including:

  • Examining and evaluating existing misclassification enforcement by executive departments and agencies
  • Developing best practices by departments and agencies to increase coordination of information and efficient enforcement
  • Developing recommendations to foster compliance with the law, including by educating employers, workers, and the public about misclassification
  • Conducting a review of existing law and applicable procedures related to misclassification

(Read More)

Governor Murphy Signs Executive Order Establishing Task Force on Employee Misclassification (NJ)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

May 3, 2018

Trenton – Governor Phil Murphy today signed an executive order establishing the Task Force on Employee Misclassification. Employee misclassification can allow employers to escape their legal responsibilities to their workers, such as ensuring adequate workplace protections and providing employment-related benefits like unemployment insurance and workers’ compensation. Employers often misclassify their employees intentionally in order to reduce labor costs and avoid paying state and federal taxes.

“The exploitation of workers is not only unethical – it is illegal,” said Governor Phil Murphy. “In New Jersey, we promote fairness, fight against discrimination, and work to end unfair labor practices. I am proud to take this step forward to end a practice that creates an unfair advantage over companies that play by the rules and hurts our working families.”

“We must crack down on wage theft,” said Attorney General Gurbir Grewal. “More and more employers are misclassifying their workers as ‘independent contractors’ because they think it’s cheaper than doing things the right way. But this practice isn’t just illegal. It actually makes New Jersey’s communities poorer in the long run by denying workers the wages and benefits to which they are legally entitled, and that are essential to building a fair and prosperous economy. We are proud to join with other states in fighting this growing problem.”

“Protecting workers’ rights is an important function of government and that role cannot just be limited to private businesses, but to the State and who it hires,” said Senate President Steve Sweeney. “When someone is in effect working as employee, but deliberately misclassified as an independent contractor, that worker is losing benefits, wages and other compensation. That just isn’t acceptable. This Task Force should ensure that the State is compliant with best practices. I look forward to working with them on this important issue. Anyone working for the State of New Jersey should know that their job, compensation and responsibilities match their job classification. This is about fairness.”

(Read More)

New Maryland Law Makes General Contractors Liable for Paying Their Subcontractors’ Employees (MD)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

May 25, 2018
JD Supra

At the tail-end of the 2018 legislative session, the Maryland General Assembly passed Senate Bill 853, making construction general contractors jointly and severally liable for the failure of their subcontractors to pay their employees in compliance with Maryland’s wage and hour laws. This new law will become effective October 1, 2018. California recently passed a similar measure, AB 1701, which is applicable to construction contracts entered into in that state on or after January 1, 2018.

This controversial new Maryland law contains both a multiplier and an attorneys’ fees provision, dramatically increasing its impact. Under existing law, an employer that fails to pay an employee in accordance with Maryland’s wage and hour laws may be liable to the employee for up to three times the wages owed, plus reasonable attorneys’ fees and other costs. Until now, this liability has largely been confined to the direct employer-employee relationship. SB 853 expands the reach of Maryland’s wage and hour law, making a general contractor on a construction services project jointly and severally liable for a subcontractor’s failure to properly pay its employees. The term “construction services” is broadly defined to include “building, reconstructing, improving, enlarging, painting, altering, and repairing” in connection with real property. Notably, the liability imposed by this new law is not limited to first-tier subcontractors; rather, it expressly applies “regardless of whether the subcontractor is in a direct contractual relationship with the general contractor.” So, a general contractor is now liable for every wage and hour law violation occurring on a construction project, including those committed by subcontractors far down the construction chain. The time frame for this liability is also expansive. A claimant may make a claim against both the general contractor and the non-paying party as soon as two weeks after a violation occurs, and as late as three years after the occurrence.

For balance, the new law requires subcontractors to indemnify the general contractor for “any wages, damages, interest, penalties, or attorney’s fees owed as a result of the subcontractor’s violation.” This protection, however, is only as strong as the subcontractor’s ability to pay such damages and costs. SB 853 increases the likelihood that employees will sue both the general contractor and their direct employer when they believe they have not been properly paid. Because general contractors are now a target for additional litigation, the potential costs subject to indemnification by subcontractors will be increased by the general contractor’s costs of defense. Additionally, because the general contractor will not always be the direct employer of the plaintiff bringing such a claim, it may not have in its possession the employee-related documents necessary to defend a claim, including a potentially fraudulent claim. Notably, the law outlines two express exceptions to indemnification: (1) when indemnification is provided for in a contract between the general contractor and the subcontractor; or (2) when a violation arose due to the general contractor’s failure to make timely payments to the subcontractor.

(Read More)

May Day Parade Stands Up Against Wage Theft (DC)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

May 07, 2018
by Negin Owliaei

As buildings rise in Navy Yard, so too do rents. The rapidly gentrifying pocket of Washington, D.C. has been lining the pockets of developers for years, but the money doesn’t always make its way to the construction workers building the luxury apartments popping up around the neighborhood.

That’s especially true for the workers contracted out by Power Design, a Florida-based electrical company that’s been sued more than a dozen times for wage theft. Activists targeted the firm’s Navy Yard construction sites on May Day to educate workers on their rights and remind the companies working with Power Design that they’re responsible for wage theft that happens on their watch.

The local DC chapter of Jobs with Justice has been leading the charge to hold Power Design accountable for its poor labor practices and to push city officials to uphold the laws meant to keep the company in check. A report released by the group earlier this year highlighted the company’s “race to the bottom” mentality.

Power Design, the report says, has faced at least 13 lawsuits around the country for wage theft. The report also details the company’s practice of classifying workers as independent contractors rather than employees, cutting corners on crucial protections and taxes and allowing Power Design to underbid other companies that uphold labor standards.

DC Jobs with Justice Executive Director Elizabeth Falcon shared this information with parade-goers as she led the crowd to various construction sites that contract to Power Design around D.C.’s Navy Yard neighborhood. “We need these developers who are taking these bids to understand we see them,” Falcon said.

(Read More)

Aldermen, labor renew push for fair work week ordinance (IL)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

05/10/2018, 07:09pm
By Fran Spielman

Armed with a new study that shows the devastating impact of “just-in-time scheduling,” a coalition of alderman and union leaders on Thursday made a renewed push for a “fair work-week” they called a “basic human rights issue.”

The City Council has approved three ordinances over the last five years aimed at confronting income inequality in Chicago.

They are: the anti-wage theft ordinance of 2013; the 2014 ordinance that raised Chicago’s minimum wage to $13-an-hour by 2019 and the ordinance mandating companies large and small – with the exception of construction companies – to provide their employees with at least five paid sick days each year.

But until workers have stable schedules – or guaranteed compensation if they don’t – the City Council’s “work is not done,” according to retiring Ald. Ameya Pawar (47th).

Pawar pointed to a survey of 1,700 workers across the state, 44 percent of them in Chicago, conducted by the University of Illinois and Penn State University.

One of every five hourly workers reported being scheduled for on-call shifts “regularly or often.”

Thirty-five percent of all workers have less than one week’s advance notice of their schedule, with 22 percent having three days or fewer notice. More than 25 percent of those surveyed are required to keep their schedules “open” with no guarantee of work.

Nearly 20 percent receive their work schedules, only after traveling to their workplaces.

“Imagine what it’s like not knowing whether you have to work in two hours. Imagine what it’s like not knowing what your schedule is like until the day before the week begins. Imagine what it’s like not knowing how you would arrange for child care if you’re working 12-to-8 on one day and 7-to-3 the next,” Pawar told a City Hall news conference.

(Read More)

Proposed labor watchdog would give city’s worker protection laws some teeth (IL)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

April 18, 2018
By Matt Kiefer

A series of recent labor reforms promised to give Chicago workers wage theft protection, boost minimum wages and guarantee paid sick time. But those promises come up empty when it comes to enforcement, workers and labor advocates say.

Enter the Office of Labor Standards, a proposed new City Hall regulatory agency that would have the power to enforce city labor ordinances, investigate claims, process complaints, issue fines and recommend other penalties. Thirty-five alderman have signed in support of an ordinance establishing the new office.

At a Wednesday morning press conference, 47th Ward Ald. Ameya Pawar announced a proposed ordinance that would consolidate the city’s labor regulation authorities under the Office of Labor Standards.

“This is the logical conclusion to passing three major progressive policies to protect workers,” Pawar said, referring to the wage theft, minimum wage and sick time ordinances that City Council has approved over the past five years. “Because it doesn’t matter if you pass it if people aren’t receiving those benefits.”

…

“We need an office dedicated to taking reports from workers like me and looking into companies who systematically steal wages,” Guerrero, a member of the labor advocacy group Arise Chicago, recounted in Spanish through a translator at today’s press conference. “When workers like me know the city has our back, we will feel safer to come forward.”

…

As proposed, the Officer of Labor Standards would be responsible for collecting complaints without identifying workers to their employers. Unless the worker and employer agree to settle the case, the office would be required to complete investigations within 60 days. A business found in violation would be liable for unpaid wages and fines, and would become ineligible to bid on city contracts for one year. Those with “willful” or repeat violations could have their business licenses revoked.
Aldermen said they modeled the proposed labor standards office after similar municipal agencies in Seattle, New York and San Francisco.

They added that they will work with the mayor’s office to allocate funding for the office, which would include a director (appointed by the mayor and confirmed by City Council) and an unspecified number of investigators and lawyers. Part of the office’s funding would come from fines levied on businesses found in violation of city ordinances, though proceeds would also support community-based outreach programs to inform workers and employers of protections under city law.

(Read More)