Oregon House OKs construction worker wage protection

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

Contractor would have to pay under some conditions

By: KTVZ.COM news sources
Posted: Feb 26, 2018 01:30 PM PST
Updated: Feb 26, 2018 01:33 PM PST

SALEM, Ore. – The Oregon House on Monday narrowly passed House Bill 4154B, which would provide construction workers with additional wage theft protections, under certain circumstances.

The legislation, championed by Rep. Julie Fahey (D-West Eugene, Junction City, Bethel), would require a general contractor to pay the wages or benefits owed to a worker by a delinquent subcontractor if a specific set of conditions is met, according to a news release from Oregon House Democrats.

“The goal of this bill is to protect wages for workers in the construction industry by adding accountability for general contractors in certain specific situations,” Rep. Faheysaid. “When workers aren’t paid what they have earned, it hurts workers and their families. It also hurts our local economies and reduces tax revenue.”

…

This legislation would create a new process through which the construction workers employed by subcontractors would be able to claim unpaid wages.

(Read More)

San Jose ballot measure would force real estate developers to hire local

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

By MARISA KENDALL
PUBLISHED: February 6, 2018 at 6:00 am | UPDATED: February 6, 2018 at 6:07 am

SAN JOSE – As Silicon Valley’s housing market booms, benefiting homeowners, landlords and developers, some activists say one group isn’t reaping its fair share of the profits: the local construction workers building these expensive homes.

A new ballot measure for San Jose seeks to change that. If approved by voters in November, the “Build Better San Jose” initiative would require developers of large, private projects to hire more local workers, and pay them better.

“Workers are not paid enough to be able to afford to live in the area,” said Louise Auerhahn, director of economic and workforce policy for public policy group Working Partnerships USA, which helped draft the measure.

Responsible Development San Jose, a coalition that supports local construction workers, is set to send the initiative to city officials Tuesday, the first step to putting it before voters in November. Once it is approved by the city, it will need 21,200 signatures to make it to the ballot.

If passed by voters, the measure would require developers in San Jose to pay workers the “prevailing wage” – a payment standard set by the California Department of Industrial Relations that varies depending on a worker’s location and specific type of work.

As of last year, the prevailing wage for construction workers classified as “laborers” in Northern California ranged from about $20 to $33 per hour. Developers also would have to put forth a “best faith effort” to hire locally for at least 30 percent of a project’s hours, hiring workers who live in San Jose or within 50 miles of the city’s limits. And developers would be required to help train new local workers by using one hour of apprentice labor for every five hours worked by an experienced worker.

(Read More)

3d_money_construction_dreamstime_xxl_21903206

A warning for Missouri: Repealing the prevailing wage on construction jobs hurts workers and the economy

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

BY MARC POULOS
Special to The Star
February 20, 2018 08:30 PM

Out of all the dubious and downright absurd ideas that some state politicians have been trying to sell taxpayers in recent years, one stands out above the rest: the suggestion that the cost of building schools, highways and other critical infrastructure could be trimmed by 20 percent by eliminating the local minimum wage – or prevailing wage – on government-funded construction projects.

Setting aside the political lunacy of essentially advocating middle-class wage cuts during an era of stagnation and rising inequality, what makes this canard especially ridiculous is that construction labor represents only a little over 20 percent of the total cost of building these projects – and it’s declining.

But that didn’t stop politicians in Indiana, Wisconsin, West Virginia and Kentucky from throwing caution and basic math to the wind. Beginning with Indiana in 2015, all four states have now repealed their prevailing wage laws. Other states, including Michigan and Missouri, are now considering following suit.

New research out of Indiana is providing even more reasons why they shouldn’t.

The Midwest Economic Policy Institute and Colorado State University-Pueblo Economist Kevin Duncan have just completed the first impact study analyzing what has happened since repeal in the Hoosier State.

(Read More)

Study finds Indiana common construction wage repeal reduced worker pay, didn’t save money on public works projects

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

By Dan Carden
Jan 29, 2018

INDIANAPOLIS – When Gov. Mike Pence signed the 2015 repeal of Indiana’s common construction wage statute, the Republican proclaimed that eliminating county minimum pay rates for public works projects would save the state and local governments money without reducing the paychecks of Hoosier workers.

“Wages on public projects should be set by the marketplace and not by government bureaucracy,” Pence said at the time.

“By repealing the common construction wage, our state is putting hardworking taxpayers first, lessening the burden on cash-strapped local governments and schools, and opening doors of opportunity for small businesses across our state.”

Three years later, the first in-depth, non-partisan analysis of the impact of Indiana’s common construction wage repeal suggests that Pence was wrong.

The Midwest Economic Policy Institute, in a report provided exclusively to The Times, determined that following common wage repeal Hoosiers working in the construction industry are earning less than they were before, with no meaningful cost savings for Indiana taxpayers.

Worker pay, productivity decline

The institute used U.S. Department of Labor statistics for the four quarters preceding repeal of Indiana’s common wage, also known as the prevailing wage, and the four quarters after to determine how the policy enacted by the Republican-controlled General Assembly affected 10 market outcomes.

The study found that construction wages fell in Indiana by an average of 8.5 percent following repeal of the common construction wage, with the lowest-paid workers seeing their paychecks drop by 15 percent.

(Read More)

(See Full PDF of Study)

EDITORIAL: Construction wage repeal needs review

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

The Times Editorial Board
Jan 30, 2018

From acts of Congress to local government ordinances, lawmakers from all levels should be willing to put their codified policies to the test.

In that vein, the Indiana Legislature should push for an empirical review of the General Assembly’s 2015 repeal of the common construction wage statute.

Whether the law remains off Indiana’s books or put back on, the decision should be made on statistical evidence and hard data, not political ideologies.

In a recent report provided to The Times, the Midwest Economic Policy Institute concluded that following the common wage repeal, Hoosier construction workers earned less than they did before, with no meaningful cost savings for Indiana taxpayers.
The law had been seen by proponents as a sort of guaranteed minimum wage for construction workers.

Opponents of the ultimately repealed law, including former Gov. Mike Pence, argued eliminating the county minimum pay rates for public works projects would save the state and local government agencies money without reducing construction workers’ paychecks. Drawing on U.S. Department of Labor statistics for the four quarters before and after the law was repealed, the institute concluded Hoosier construction wages fell by an average of 8.5 percent after the repeal.

The lowest-paid workers saw their paychecks fall by an average of 15 percent, according to the institute.

Construction wages in neighboring Illinois, Michigan and Ohio, meanwhile, grew a combined 2.8 percent.

The institute also reported the repeal didn’t contribute to more competition for public works projects, among other findings, and thus didn’t lead to measurable savings.

(Read More)

Guest Column: Protect prevailing wage to save jobs

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

By Kevin Hertel, Special to Digital First Media
POSTED: 01/30/18, 3:35 PM EST

Michigan’s prevailing wage laws have helped mitigate the effects of this misguided perception. Passage of prevailing wage laws proved that we have had the good sense to make sure that the people who build our schools and office buildings, keep our air conditioners working in the summer and furnaces working in the winter, and come out to unplug our drains at all hours of the day and night will always earn a living wage. This law stands not just to serve as a “minimum wage for tradespeople,” it also protects small contracting businesses. Since everyone is competing at the same baseline pay scale, top tradespeople are not immediately drawn to a company that is able to pay them more than a mom-and-pop contractor. Prevailing wages, then, are simply wages that help all workers in the construction industry earn a fair day’s pay for a fair day’s work.

The bottom line is this: Michigan is a manufacturing state. Our economy cannot exist, let alone continue its upward trend, if we pull the financial rug out from underneath skilled trade workers and leave no benefits to working in the trades. Every legislator I know would say that Career and Technical Education is the key to a successful state-many have worked to ensure that their centers for it are state of the art, as is Macomb County’s. However, if prevailing wage is repealed, this push will have been for nothing-no one is willing to go through that much training and certification to end up making $9.25 an hour. Repealing prevailing wage puts the future of our state at risk.

Democrat Kevin Hertel is a state representative from St. Clair Shores.

(Read More)

NEW STUDY: Prevailing Wage Laws Close Income Gaps for African Americans in Construction

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

FEBRUARY 28, 2018
PUBLISHED BY – Frank Manzo IV

Prevailing wage laws reduce income inequality between African-American and white construction workers by as much as 53% and help more blue-collar workers reach the middle class, according to new research by the Illinois Economic Policy Institute (ILEPI) and University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Project for Middle Class Renewal.

“While prior research has concluded that there is no relationship between prevailing wage laws and the racial composition of the construction workforce, the data clearly shows that these laws help eliminate income disparities between black and white construction workers,” said study co-author and University of Illinois Professor Robert Bruno. “African Americans employed as laborers, plumbers, pipefitters, electricians, and heavy equipment operators see the largest gains.”

Utilizing publicly-available data from the American Community Survey, the study examined construction worker earnings by race and trade, comparing the results between states with prevailing wage laws and those without. Overall, the researchers found that prevailing wage laws lift the incomes of African American construction workers by an average of 24%, and close the income gap with white workers from 26% to just 12%.

A more advanced analysis controlling for other observable factors found that states which currently do not have a prevailing wage law could reduce income inequality for African-American construction workers by at least 7% if they implemented one.

(Read More)

(Read Executive Summary)

Illinois House Testimonies on the Consequences of Repealing Prevailing Wage

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

MARCH 1, 2018
PUBLISHED BY – Frank Manzo IV

On Tuesday, February 27, the Labor and Commerce Committee in the Illinois House held a hearing titled “Impacts of Repealing the Prevailing Wage.” Frank Manzo IV, MPP, Policy Director of the Illinois Economic Policy Institute (ILEPI); Robert Bruno, Ph.D., Director of the Project for Middle Class Renewal at the University of Illinois; and Kevin Duncan, Ph.D., Professor of Economics at Colorado State University-Pueblo submitted testimonies.

Good afternoon, Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee. My name is Frank Manzo IV. I am the Policy Director of the Illinois Economic Policy Institute, a nonprofit research organization that provides candid and dynamic analyses on major subjects affecting the economies of Illinois and the Midwest- specializing in the construction industry.

Economic research finds that repeal of state prevailing wage laws decreases construction worker incomes and reduces apprenticeship training. For example, a peer-reviewed study published within the past week found that blue-collar construction income and benefits fell by between 4 and 11 percent in states that repealed their prevailing wage laws since the 1970s. Another analysis of nine states that repealed their prevailing wage laws since the 1970s found that repeal was associated with a 40 percent decrease in training.

Workers are better trained in states with prevailing wage, so they complete public projects more efficiently. The preponderance of economic research finds that prevailing wage does not affect construction costs. Since 2000, there have been 11 peer-reviewed studies that used regression analysis to examine the effect of prevailing wage on school construction costs. Ten of these studies, or 91 percent, find no statistical impact on the cost of school projects. Repealing prevailing wage does not reduce costs for taxpayers.

…

My name is Robert Bruno and I am a Professor of Labor and Employment Relations in the School of Labor and Employment Relations at the University of Illinois. I also serve as Director of the Labor Education Program and Director of the Project for Middle Class Renewal.

…

The Illinois Prevailing Wage Act levels the playing field for all contractors by ensuring that state and local expenditures maintain and reflect local area standards for wages and benefits.

Prevailing wage is a partial solution to a problem caused by the low-bid model: contractors aiming to lower their bids through cutthroat reductions in wages, benefits, and apprenticeship training. By taking labor costs out of the equation, prevailing wage incentivizes construction contractors to compete on the basis of efficiency and core competencies, rather than on undermining middle-class compensation standards.

(Read More)

Veterans speak out about prevailing wages in Lansing

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

By News 10
Posted: Tue 12:17 PM, Feb 27, 2018
Updated: Tue 7:26 PM, Feb 27, 2018

LANSING, Mich. (WILX) – A group of Veterans gathered in Lansing Tuesday to speak out about and support the prevailing wage vote.

Veterans from three skilled trade unions talked at a press conference at the Michigan Senate building on Tuesday morning.

Their message, “a vote against prevailing wage is a vote against high-quality jobs that allow veterans to support themselves and their families.”

…

“Veterans bring with them the experience, grit and sense of unity necessary to succeed in the skilled trades,” said Brad Reed, a business representative for the Michigan Council of Carpenters and Millwrights (MRCC) and Army veteran. “By protecting the prevailing wage, these high-skill, high-demand jobs are more available and accessible to our nation’s heroes.”

(Read More)

Employers Steal $15B From Low Wage Workers Each Year

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

February 23, 2018

Biography

David Cooper is a Senior Economic Analyst & Deputy Director of EARN. David conducts both national and state-level research, with a focus on the minimum wage, wage theft, employment and unemployment, poverty, and wage and income trends. He also coordinates and provides technical support to the Economic Analysis and Research Network (EARN), a national network of over 60 state-level policy research and advocacy organizations.

… wage theft can occur in a variety of different forms. It can be everything from a worker not being paid for all the hours that they’ve worked, to workers not getting overtime for working more than 40 hours per week, someone getting paid less than the minimum wage, even things like illegal deduction from folks’ paychecks or not getting meal breaks.The really egregious cases are when folks don’t get paid at all and believe or not, that happens more frequently than we certainly would like, particularly in certain industries where there’s a lot of use of, for example, immigrant labor or sub-contractors who may not be paid, not just for all the hours that that they work, but some of them don’t actually even get any of the money that they’re owed.

(Read More)