Amy DiPierro
Palm Springs Desert Sun
Published 10:53 a.m. PT
Sept. 10, 2018
Kimpton Hotel and other real estate developments in downtown Palm Springs are subject to a prevailing wage, a state agency has found, due in part to more than $140 million in city funding and projected tax rebates to the complex. The California Department of Industrial Relations’ determination means the developer of the projects could owe untold amounts of additional wages to workers who built the hotel and shopping district.
The DIR’s August 13 letter, which determined the downtown project is subject to prevailing wage, could sully a tony new development that city officials have hailed for revitalizing the downtown corridor, even after the original developer of the project was charged with allegedly bribing city officials for a sweetheart deal.
Palm Springs Promenade LLC, the limited liability company formed by Wessman Development to build the Kimpton and Virgin hotels as well as office and retail space, received $46 million in city funding and could receive an additional $100 million in potential transient occupancy tax refunds, according to a detailed review of city contracts by DIR.
The prevailing wage rate is the hourly wage paid to a majority of like workers on public works projects in the same place or labor market. Essentially, a prevailing wage is a minimum wage for specific types of workers, when they work on projects that benefit from public funds.
While some cities exempt publicly-funded projects from prevailing wage because of their benefits to residents, DIR Acting Director André Schoorl concluded in the agency’s determination that the downtown complex is not exempt, because the project is neither built, owned nor operated by the city and has the primary purpose of private profit.
“The city’s decision to subsidize the profit margin of (a) private landowner in the city’s downtown is not equivalent in purpose, scale, or function, to the purely municipal acts of building a local fire station or fencing for a reservoir,” Schoorl wrote.
The DIR determination means construction workers that built the Kimpton and other downtown structures could get a boost if wages are found to be owed. Workers and other interested parties may file a complaint with DIR, according to the agency, which would then trigger an investigation into whether workers have already received the correct prevailing wages or not.
…
California charter cities can pass laws exempting locally-funding public works projects from state prevailing wage law if they are deemed to be purely “municipal affairs,” like a fire department or library.
But in an August 13 letter, DIR Acting Director André Schoorl noted the hotel and shopping development built by Palm Springs Promenade “has no such obvious public purpose” that would make it exempt from paying prevailing wage. And while the city sought to incentivize developers to invest in blighted properties downtown, Schoorl concluded construction in downtown Palm Springs “was primarily undertaken for private benefit and profit, with a subsidiary goal of removing blight.”
…
The Center for Contract Compliance, a nonprofit labor advocate founded by contractors unions, in January 2017 requested DIR review whether the downtown project is subject to prevailing wage.
Although DIR determinations do not set a precedent – meaning it is advice given to a specific project, not a precedent applying to subsequent cases – Center for Contract Compliance Executive Director Branden Lopez said the reasoning in the Palm Springs Promenade case could apply to other jobs, too.
“The reasoning in the case, it applies statewide if they have similar facts,” he said.
Multiple cities in California have subsidized proposed hotel developments on a case-by-case basis. Additionally, according to research commissioned by the city of Long Beach in May 2017, at least five cities and one county in California, including Cathedral City and Palm Springs, have formal economic incentive programs for hotels.
