Federal Court Orders 4 Arizona Contractors to Pay Over $3.2m in Owed Wages, Damages to 890 Workers after Department of Labor Investigations

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

Agency: Wage and Hour Division
Date: April 22, 2024
Release Number: 24-608-NAT

Employers also liable for $95K in penalties for overtime, minimum wage violations

PHOENIX – The U.S. Department of Labor announced today that efforts to protect residential construction workers from unlawful pay practices have recovered a total of $3.2 million in wages and damages from four Arizona contractors for 890 workers.

After a series of investigations, the department’s Wage and Hour Division determined that 4-E Painting LLC and Liberty Constructors LLC in Mesa and BCK Coatings Inc. and Geronimo Wall Systems LLC in Tempe willfully and recklessly shortchanged the affected workers and violated the overtime and minimum wage provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The division’s investigations found:

  • 4-E Painting LLC did not pay overtime wages when the employer paid employees piece-rate wages for painting work or a combination of hourly wages and piece-rate wages. The division determined 4-E Painting owed $432,633 in overtime wages and an equal amount in liquidated damages to 158 workers. The department also assessed $24,732 in penalties.
  • Liberty Constructors LLC denied employees required overtime pay and tried to conceal its violations by falsely showing a higher hourly rate or fewer hours worked on payroll records. The division found the contractor owes $401,049 in unpaid wages and $401,049 in liquidated damages to 100 employees. The department also assessed $17,900 in civil penalties.
  • Geronimo Wall Systems LLC denied overtime pay to 195 employees for hours over 40 in a workweek. The lath, stucco, siding and stone contractor misclassified many of the employees as independent contractors. The division determined the employer owes $443,115 in overtime wages and $443,115 in damages to 195 employees, and the department assessed $22,770 in civil money penalties.
  • BCK Coatings Inc. failed to pay required overtime wages for hours over 40 in a workweek. The apartment remodeling contractor misclassified employees as independent contractors, made improper deductions of up to $20 per week from employees’ pay, required workers to cash their paychecks at a check-cashing business that charged a fee and failed to pay one employee for eight weeks of work. The investigation found BCK owes $360,000 in unpaid minimum and overtime wages and an equal amount in liquidated damages to 437 employees. The department also assessed $30,000 in penalties for the employer’s willful violations.

“Our investigators have found that schemes to pay straight-time for all hours worked and avoid paying required overtime rates at time and one-half are pervasive among employers in Arizona’s construction industry,” said Wage and Hour Division District Director Eric Murray in Phoenix. “These unlawful practices create the false impression that piece-rate workers’ wages comply with the Fair Labor Standards Act when, in fact, these employees are being stripped of their earned wages. The Wage and Hour Division is committed to holding employers accountable and ensuring that they do not obtain an unfair competitive advantage by denying workers their full wages.”

(See Full Article)

Maryland construction company owes the District money for trying to cheat its employees

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

Author: Samantha Gilstrap
Updated: 8:07 PM EDT April 18, 2023

As part of the settlement, the company also agreed not to bid on or provide work under any D.C. government contracts for one year.

WASHINGTON — A construction company operating out of Washington, D.C. owes the District money after trying to cheat its employees out of sick leave and other employment benefits to which they were legally owed, according to the Attorney General’s Office.

Authorities say Maryland Applicators intentionally misclassified employees as independent contractors to avoid having to provide them with the proper sick leave and other employment benefits. Now, the company must pay $835,000 to the District.

As part of the settlement, the company also agreed not to bid on or provide work under any D.C. government contracts for one year, D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb said.

“Maryland Applicators denied District workers the sick leave and other employment benefits they had earned by misclassifying them as independent contractors rather than employees. This not only cheated the workers but gave Maryland Applicators an unfair advantage over their competitors who follow the law,” Schwalb said. “My office is committed to protecting District workers, ensuring they receive the wages and benefits they are legally owed, and leveling the playing field for all law-abiding District businesses.”

Maryland Applicators is a Maryland corporation that provides construction services on projects in Washington, D.C.

Authorities claim it employed dozens of misclassified workers and also secured the services of hundreds of additional misclassified workers through subcontracts with other companies.

The misclassification is as a form of wage theft that reduces costs for companies at the expense of employees, Schwalb said.

Authorities say misclassifying employees as independent contractors deprives them of rights that employees are entitled to, such as the minimum wage, overtime compensation, and paid sick leave.

Illegal misclassification also deprives the District of tax revenue, unemployment insurance premiums, and workers compensation contributions.

D.C. construction companies that misclassify workers unlawfully avoid at least 16.7% in labor costs compared to companies following the law, providing an unfair advantage over their competition.

As a result of the settlement, Maryland Applicators must:

  • Pay $835,000 divided as follows:
    • $489,000 will be paid to the District.
    • $346,000 will be paid to affected workers.
  • Change its practices to ensure that all workers hired for projects in the District are properly classified in compliance with District law and receive the wages and benefits they are legally owed.
  • Refrain from bidding on or providing work on contracts paid by the District government in the District for one year.

(See Article)

unnamed

DOL and IRS Unite to Battle Misclassifying Workers

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

Jan. 12, 2023 | David Sparkman

Agreement follows similar arrangements between other federal agencies.

In mid-December 2022, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) published an updated Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for employment tax referrals that arise from investigations of workers’ possible employment misclassifications.

This agreement follows a pattern of similar partnerships entered into by other federal agencies during the Biden Administration that also have been crafted specifically to deal with the classification issue.

“We are determined to identify and resolve labor violations by employers who benefit by misclassifying employees as independent contractors and deprive them of the protections of the labor standards laws we enforce,” said Jessica Looman, principal deputy wage and hour administrator.

In 2011, DOL’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD) and the IRS first entered into a similar MOU to allow both agencies to use their resources to promote employer compliance with obligations to pay employee’ and related employment taxes.

The new MOU explains that the two agencies will establish a methodology for exchanging investigative leads, complaints and referrals of possible violations “to the extent allowable by law and policy.” However, the agencies assert that the terms of the MOU do not provide for any exchange of federal tax information.

The memo explains that the collaboration will enable both agencies to leverage existing resources and promote employer compliance with obligations to properly pay their employees and to pay all applicable employment taxes.

Although concerns over misclassification have been around for decades, the primary target has most often centered around independent contractors, such as trucking owner-operators. Concerns at the state level have included the failure of contractors to pay for workers’ compensation insurance and unemployment taxes. The focus has been expanded in recent years to include all sorts of freelancers and gig workers, such as computer programmers, and also has been a long-term issue for the nation’s labor unions who are prohibited by law from organizing independent contractors.

A new set of criteria that eliminates most of those workers who previously were able to legally claim independent contractor status was enacted in a California law and is being emulated by other states. The California approach also is contained in legislation that was introduced by Democrats in Congress as soon as President Biden was sworn in but has yet to make much headway.

Before the DOL-IRS announcement took place, the most recent similar agreement between federal agencies was forged between the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regarding gig workers. That MOU is aimed at addressing a number of other labor law issues in addition to workers’ misclassification, such as noncompete and nondisclosure provisions that may be included in worker contracts.

The new DOL-IRS agreement states that the “collaboration will enable both agencies to leverage existing resources and promote employer compliance with obligations to properly pay employees and to pay employment taxes. This multi-agency approach presents a united compliance front to employers and their representatives.”

(Read More)

unnamed

Labor & Industry Helps Return $8.5 Million To Workers Wronged By Employers In 2022

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

Jan. 5, 2023 | bctv.org

In 2022, the Pennsylvania Department of Labor & Industry (L&I) investigated more than 4,500 complaints of alleged labor law violations and returned more than $8.5 million in earned wages to Pennsylvania workers whose employers violated a labor law, according to data released Tuesday by L&I Secretary Jennifer Berrier.

“Workers in Pennsylvania have the right to keep every cent they rightfully earn,” Berrier said. “The department’s Bureau of Labor Law Compliance holds employers accountable when they wrongfully deny workers their earned wages or when they violate any of Pennsylvania’s labor laws. From ensuring proper overtime wages are paid to protecting children from exploitative work, the bureau enforces 13 labor and employment laws that are essential to the protection and safety of every worker in the commonwealth.”

Most of the complaints investigated in 2022 and in recent years were relevant to the Wage Payment and Collection Law (WPCL), the Minimum Wage Act (MWA), the Prevailing Wage Act, (PWA), the Child Labor Act (CLA) and the Construction Workplace Misclassification Act (CWMA).

  • Under the WPCL, the bureau investigates complaints filed by persons alleging nonpayment of wages, final paychecks or fringe benefits. In 2022, the bureau collected more than $6.6 million from about 1,200 employers in violation of the law and returned those dollars to workers, up from more than $2 million from about 900 employers in 2021.
  • Under the MWA, the bureau investigates complaints alleging employers failed to pay minimum wage or overtime. In August 2022, the bureau also began enforcement of regulations largely affecting tipped employees. During all of 2022, the bureau collected $915,000 from 70 employers in violation of the law and returned those dollars to workers, up from $566,000 from 60 employers in 2021.
  • Under the PWA, the bureau enforces requirements for prevailing wage rates on publicly funded construction projects. In 2022, the bureau determined more than 9,500 prevailing wage violations (up from 8,500 in 2021) and returned more than $1 million to workers who were not paid the proper prevailing wages on projects across the commonwealth.
  • Under the CLA, the bureau investigates allegations of child employees engaged in prohibited occupations, working excessive hours, not receiving mandated break times, or working in dangerous conditions. In 2022, the bureau issued fines to more than 100 entities and collected $205,000 in child labor fines that were deposited into the general fund.
  • Under the CWMA, the bureau investigates allegations of construction-industry employers misclassifying employees as independent contractors. In 2022, the bureau issued penalties to more than 125 construction-industry employers and collected$272,965 in fines. These funds are deposited into the commonwealth’s Unemployment Compensation Trust Fund.

Altogether in 2022, $8.5 million was returned to nearly 10,000 workers.

In December 2022, the Joint Task Force on Misclassification of Employees – a bipartisan-nominated group of volunteers representing business, labor, and government perspectives – submitted its final report to the General Assembly with 15 unanimous recommendations – including extension of the Construction Workplace Misclassification Act beyond the construction trades to cover other industries in the commonwealth.

Since 2015, the Bureau of Labor Law Compliance has collected $46 million in unlawfully withheld wages from employers and returned those dollars to the workers who earned them. During the same period, the bureau has collected nearly $3 million in fines from more than 1,000 contractors in violation of the CWMA and has collected $3.8 million in fines from 430 different entities in violation of the Child Labor Act.

In addition to the laws mentioned above, the bureau enforces the Prohibition of Excessive Overtime in Health Care Act, the Equal Pay Law, the Inspection of Employment Records Law, the Industrial Homework Law, the Seasonal Farm Labor Law, the Medical Fee Act, the Construction Industry Employee Verification Act and regulations on apprenticeship and training.

The Bureau of Labor Law Compliance includes 26 investigators, four supervisors and six central office staff who work in district offices located in Altoona, Harrisburg, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and Scranton.

 

unnamed

ID and Tax Solution for Construction Worker Misclassification and Immigration Challenges

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

By Charles Frantes
May 19, 2022

A recent presentation at the University of Saint Thomas in Houston highlighted how challenges associated with the outdated US immigration system have cultivated an inefficient, unethical, and unsafe shadow economy that threatens the sustainability of the construction industry. Stan Marek, CEO of MAREK, and Loren Steffy, award-winning author and business journalist, discussed how workforce shortages, the lack of a pathway for unauthorized immigrants to earn legal status, and the lack of enforcement against worker misclassification and payroll fraud have made it easier for unscrupulous employers in the construction industry to profit at the expense of law-abiding taxpayers, workers, and businesses. They called on lawmakers to pass a bipartisan ID and Tax policy as a solution.

In the construction industry where workforce shortages are rampant and competition for bids is fierce, Marek explained that one way that many companies cut costs is by classifying their workers as independent contractors instead of employees. Many businesses also pay workers off the books in cash. This allows those employers to avoid paying payroll taxes and providing benefits like health insurance and workers’ compensation. Doing this not only allows those employers to undercut and underbid companies that are following the rules, it also cheats taxpayers, and leads to a degradation of the trades due to a lack of emphasis on training and the treatment of workers as disposable.

Marek stressed the importance of the employer-to-employee relationship and the safety and skills training that comes along with it and explained how doing things the right way can actually end up saving costs in the long run and even help to alleviate rising housing costs.

“When you have a system where everybody is an independent contractor and you don’t have an employee to employer relationship, they don’t get the training that employees do. Our company prides itself on safety. Job sites are dangerous. Safety is number one, and then skills training. Somebody that is trained to do a specific function does it better. A big problem we have in construction is doing it twice. So many people, when they’re not trained, make a mistake and it has to be redone. It’s estimated 20-25% of projects have to be redone because people don’t have the skills training,” said Marek.

(Read More)

Construction,Site,Workers,-,Aerial,-,Top,View

Maine Voices: Proper worker classification is a vital foundation of Maine’s economy

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

BY LAURA A. FORTMAN AND JOHN C. ROHDE – SPECIAL TO THE PRESS HERALD
December 23, 2021

Misclassification deprives employees of needed protections, puts other employers at a disadvantage and affects taxpayers as well

A recent court case (“Scarborough roofing contractor found not guilty in death of worker,” Dec. 9) has raised the issue of worker classification. We, along with Maine State Chamber of Commerce President Dana Connors and Maine AFL-CIO President Cynthia Phinney, are writing to explain why the proper classification of workers is so important.

When an individual or business hires another person to perform work for them, that person will either be an employee or an independent contractor. Misclassification occurs when an employer hires an employee but treats them like an independent contractor.

Why does it matter if an employer treats an employee like an independent contractor? There are several important reasons.

• Independent contractors who do not purchase workers’ compensation insurance do not have access to lost wages and medical benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Act if they are injured on the job. An employee misclassified as an independent contractor can file a claim with the Workers’ Compensation Board. However, in addition to showing they were hurt at work, the misclassified employee will also have to prove they were an employee. This almost always means the injured employee’s claim will take longer to resolve.

In the meantime, and maybe permanently if the employer does not have workers’ compensation insurance, an injured misclassified employee will have to find a way to pay for the medical treatment they need. If the injury is serious, they may have to do this without any income.

• Similarly, if a misclassified worker loses their job through no fault of their own and files for unemployment insurance, it will take longer for the employee’s unemployment claim to be resolved.

• Employers that misclassify employees as independent contractors are probably not following federal and state employment laws that regulate minimum wages, overtime, paid leave and safety, among other protections. Misclassified employees may receive less pay than they are entitled to and work in conditions that are not as safe as they should be.

• Misclassification also adversely affects other employers. Employers that properly classify their workers – as the vast majority do – will find themselves at a disadvantage when bidding for jobs or otherwise competing against employers that do not. Employers that follow the law may also pay higher workers’ compensation rates if the pool of workers they are insuring is smaller because their competitors have misclassified their employees.

(Read More)

Renewed Push Coming for Worker Misclassification Crackdown

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

by Scott Braddock | September 26, 2019

Later this year, Democrats in the US House of Representatives plan to restart their push to penalize companies that compensate their workers as independent contractors when, by law, they should be classified as employees and compensated as such.

Of course, there are many legitimate uses of contract labor. But the issue arises when employers abuse the classification to skirt payroll taxes and benefits like health care and retirement plans.

Unscrupulous employers often use the practice to be able to submit much lower bids for projects, undercutting responsible contractors. Several states have already passed laws to penalize those who cheat workers and taxing agencies in this way. California is pressing ahead with major reforms and Texas, several years ago, passed a targeted crackdown on misclassification on taxpayer-funded construction.

Bloomberg has more on the new push by House Democrats in Washington:

The bill comes as Uber, Lyft, and other gig economy companies have been embroiled in legal disputes over their classification of workers as independent contractors. That designation means the workers aren’t protected by minimum wage and overtime pay requirements, don’t have the right to unionize, and aren’t eligible for workers’ compensation and unemployment insurance benefits.

Gig companies recently led an unsuccessful lobbying blitz against a new California law that makes it harder to classify workers as contractors.

Classification questions have also plagued construction and a wide range of other industries.

Previous versions of the bill would have amended the Fair Labor Standards Act to require employers to accurately classify workers and double the liquidated damages for unpaid wages owed to those wrongly treated as contractors. The bill also would have banned businesses from retaliating against workers for challenging their classification.

Here is a copy of the bill as proposed.

(See Article)

TWO MASSACHUSETTS FIRMS FALL SHORT ON $2.4 MILLION OWED OVER IC MISCLASSIFICATION (MA)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

Staffing Industry Analysts
September 18, 2019

Two Massachusetts construction companies and their officers have fallen short on payments required under a 2016 consent judgement over Fair Labor Standards Act violations that included misclassifying workers as independent contractors, the US Department of Labor reported. Now, labor officials are asking the court to hold them in civil contempt.

The consent judgment required them to pay $2.4 million in back wages and liquidated damages to 478 employees. However, they have paid only $477,900 and currently owe nearly $1.8 million plus interest to affected employees, according to the department.

“These employers conceded that they unlawfully kept the wages of 478 employees and committed themselves to paying those employees under a consent judgment and order of the court. In violation of that order, the employers have unlawfully kept $1,179,842.55 of their employees’ hard-earned wages,” said Maia Fisher, regional solicitor of labor for New England.

“After numerous attempts to resolve the employers’ continued failure to comply with the court order, the US Department of Labor now asks the court to hold the defendants in contempt and impose all sanctions required, including imprisonment if necessary, to ensure compliance with the court’s original order,” Fisher said.

Named in the original 2016 consent judgement and order are Force Corp., AB Construction Group Inc. and employers Juliana Fernandes and Anderson dos Santos.

(See Article)

NJ Department of Labor Adopts Regulations on Suspension and Revocation of Employer Licenses (NJ)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

National Law Review
Friday, October 18, 2019

Continuing New Jersey’s efforts to eliminate and to hold employers accountable for employee misclassification, the state’s Department of Labor and Workforce Development (NJDOL) recently adopted Regulations implementing a 2010 law (“Law”) that empowers the NJDOL Commissioner (“Commissioner”) under certain circumstances to direct the suspension or revocation of one or more licenses held by an employer who has failed to maintain and report required State wage, benefits and tax records or who has failed to pay wages, benefits, taxes or other contributions required by State law. The Regulations specifically empower the Commissioner to direct the suspension and revocation of State-issued occupational and professional licenses, such as for physicians, dentists and other licensed healthcare professionals, where such individuals have management responsibilities sufficient to be deemed an “employer.” Incorporating the definition of employer contained in Article 1 of New Jersey’s “Wages” law N.J.S.A. 34:11-4.1(a), the Regulation states, “the officers of a corporation and any agents having the management of such corporation shall be deemed to be the employers of the employees of the corporation.”

By way of summary, under the Law, upon the Commissioner’s finding that an employer has failed to maintain and report all required documentation regarding wages, benefits and taxes and has failed to pay the wages, benefits, taxes or other contributions due – for even a single employee – an employer will face a NJDOL audit within 12 months. Such taxes and contributions owed to the State include for example, employment taxes, and unemployment and temporary disability contributions.

If the NJDOL audit reveals further violation, the Commissioner may direct other New Jersey agencies to suspend or revoke State-issued licenses held by the offending employer. In addition, the employer will be subject to another audit within 12 months. If the Commissioner finds, after hearing, that the employer has continued in its failure to comply with the Law, the Commissioner is empowered to direct permanent revocation of the employer’s State-issued licenses.

Since taking office in 2018, New Jersey under Gov. Phil Murphy has taken action targeting employee misclassification, including the establishment of a Task Force on Employee Misclassification (“Task Force”) (see Task Force Act Now Advisory) and a sweeping “Wage Theft” law (see Wage Theft Act Now Advisory), which added substantial penalties for failure to pay wages and benefits to employees, including workers who were incorrectly classified as exempt or independent contractors. The Regulations, further highlight the Murphy Administration’s focus on this issue by adding another potential element of personal liability for such violations for New Jersey’s licensed professionals who are deemed employers.

(See Article)

unnamed

Central Pennsylvania contractor charged for theft of workers’ wage and benefits (PA)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

Sep 30, 2019

Harrisburg – Attorney General Josh Shapiro announced charges against a Centre County contractor after a Grand Jury investigation found that he underpaid workers on Prevailing Wage projects totaling more than $64,000 in wages and benefits for at least five years.

Scott Cameron Good, 56, of State College, is the owner of Goodco Mechanical, Inc., a mechanical contractor based in Centre County who worked on public works projects in Clearfield, Centre and other Pennsylvania counties. Good was charged with Perjury, Tampering with Public Records, and False Swearing. Goodco was charged with Theft by Unlawful Taking, Deceptive and Fraudulent Business Practices and related charges.

The charges are the result of a 21-month Statewide Grand Jury investigation that originated from allegations of theft of wages and benefits from employees on a $16 million public works project in Clearfield County for the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation in 2014. The investigation found that Good and Goodco violated prevailing wage laws by underpaying wages and claiming unlawful benefits credits on the Clearfield County PennDOT project, as well as other prevailing wage projects since at least 2010.

Scott Good previously worked as Vice President for Allied Mechanical and Electrical, Inc. In 2006, the company was found to be in violation of Pennsylvania prevailing wage laws and was sanctioned by the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry for the same practice that he is accused of operating at Goodco.

“Pennsylvania’s prevailing wage laws are designed to protect workers and ensure an even playing field in the bidding process for government contracts,” said Attorney General Josh Shapiro. “The defendants are charged with violating these laws and cheating our hardworking laborers out of thousands of dollars in wages and benefits. Scott Good already knew that his conduct was illegal because his former company was sanctioned for similar violations more than a decade ago, yet he brazenly flouted the law again and continued the scheme at Goodco. I’m proud to work with Clearfield County District Attorney William Shaw Jr. to put a stop to this theft and stand up for workers.”

“Clearfield County laborers deserve to be paid fairly for their hard work,” said District Attorney William Shaw, Jr. “The defendants allegedly took advantage of their workers and violated prevailing wage laws by operating a misclassification scheme inside the company. My office will work alongside the Attorney General’s Office to hold Scott Good and Goodco accountable for their crimes and deliver results for the workers he underpaid.”

(Read More)