New Jersey Senate Bill A4897

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

Permits … 50 year local public contracts for certain capital improvements and extends prevailing wage requirements to certain work performed under those contracts.

Second, contracts for the provision or performance of goods and services that require: (i) a total capital expenditure of more than $300,000, including expenditures by the lessee; or (ii) a capital improvement that has a life expectancy upon completion greater than 20 years, may be for a period of up to 50 years. The chief financial officer of the local government unit, however, is required to certify that the capital expenditure or capital improvement requirement is satisfied. The prevailing wage would have to be paid for any construction project under these capital improvement contracts.

(Read More)

(Copy of Bill)

Washington State Gov. Jay Inslee Increases Wage Protections on Public Works Jobs (WA)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

May 7 , 2019

Public works projects in Washington state will have increased protections for construction workers with the enactment of a bill that allows them additional time to file complaints over failure to pay the proper wages.

Gov. Jay Inslee (D) signed into law May 7 ESSB 5035, which increases the window from 30 to 60 days after a public works job is accepted to file a complaint over failure to pay the prevailing wage.

(PDF Copy of Bill)

bill-would-allow-cities-counties-to-opt-out-of-prevailing-wage

OPINION: Prevailing-wage repeal, not as benign as some would have you believe

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

By: Dan Shaw
May 3, 2019 11:48 am

Prevailing-wage laws require that construction workers on public construction projects be paid the wages and benefits offered on similar jobs performed by local Wisconsin workers.

This is by no means an extreme idea. In fact, in a recent poll, 83% of the respondents who identified themselves as likely Wisconsin voters said they believe that bid prices for public works should take into account wages and benefits that are comparable to those paid in the same trades elsewhere in the state. Sixty-one percent specifically said they support prevailing-wage laws.

In other words, the public understands that public-works projects should stimulate the local and state economy by properly paying Wisconsin workers. John Mielke and the organization he runs, the Associated Builders and Contractors of Wisconsin, clearly disagree.

After the repeal of state prevailing-wage laws for municipal projects, we saw a nearly 40% increase from 2015 to 2018 in the number of out-of-state contractors winning municipal public works projects in Wisconsin. In 2018 alone, more than $160 million worth of municipal public-works projects were awarded to out-of-state contractors.

For every dollar of construction value that is completed by an out-of-state contractor, economic activity decreases by $2.26 in Wisconsin. In 2018, Wisconsin lost more than $361 million worth of economic activity by having out-of-state contractors perform these local taxpayer-funded projects. It is too soon to measure the effects of losing prevailing-wage protections on state-funded projects, but we can all assume the outcomes will be similar.

I agree with Mr. Mielke that the U.S. economy is growing and that contractors in Wisconsin are scrambling to find skilled workers. Simple principles of supply and demand require the wages of these workers to increase.

(Read More)

unnamed

NJ Labor Department Returns $162K in Back Wages to Truck Drivers After Prevailing Wage Violation Investigation (NJ)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

NJ Labor Department Returns $162K in Back Wages to Truck Drivers
After Prevailing Wage Violation Investigation

May 22, 2019, 3:01 pm

TRENTON – An investigation conducted by the NJ Department of Labor and Workforce Development’s (NJDOL) Division of Wage and Hour Compliance revealed that Richard E. Pierson Construction, Inc. of Woodstown failed to properly pay its truck drivers $162,912.53, in accordance with the Garden State’s prevailing wage laws.

The inquiry, sparked by a formal complaint to NJDOL, determined that 48 of the company’s drivers were properly paid by the employer only when the drivers were on public works job sites, but were not paid the state’s prevailing wage for the time hauling materials to and from those job sites, which is against the law.

“Public contracting is a privilege – not a right, and New Jersey workers deserve to take home every single penny they have earned,” said Labor Commissioner Robert Asaro-Angelo. “We want employers to know that we take the state’s prevailing wage laws seriously, and we will continue to investigate these matters to protect our taxpayers’ investments.”

Richard E. Pierson Construction, Inc. fully cooperated with the investigation and, once advised of the law, agreed to perform a self-audit, repay the due back wages to employees, and pay administrative fees and penalties in excess of $58,000.

The New Jersey Prevailing Wage Act (N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.25 et seq.) establishes a prevailing wage level for workers engaged in public works projects to safeguard their efficiency and general well-being, and to protect workers – as well as employers – from the effects of serious and unfair competition. In New Jersey, these rates vary by county and type of work performed.

For more information on New Jersey’s wage and hour laws, please visit myworkrights.nj.gov.

(Read More)

Public-works projects must pay prevailing wages (NY)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

OP-ED By John R. Durso
Posted May 23, 2019

Few public policies do more to build strong communities across our region than New York’s prevailing-wage law for public-works projects. It is a job-creating economic engine that puts members of our local communities to work and creates local wealth, revenue and investment. However, this useful public law has been undermined because the definition of public works has been blurred by the amalgamation of public and private financing. A bill passed in the State Assembly and awaiting action by the Senate would require that all Industrial Development Agency-funded projects pay prevailing wages, and would help to ensure that our tax dollars are creating careers with fair wages and benefits for Long Islanders who want to build lives here.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo offered a proposal in his Executive Budget to restore the application of prevailing wages to projects receiving public dollars. New York state was on the verge of restoring these protections as originally outlined by statute in 1897, and enshrined in the state Constitution in 1938, but unfortunately, this policy priority fell off the table.

Opponents of restoring prevailing-wage protections assume that higher construction wages directly correlate to higher project costs. This just isn’t true. The best-case scenario is they are drawing this conclusion based on flawed studies, and at worst they are deliberately misleading communities and elected officials to frame the public discourse for their own profit.

According to a state-funded study by Professor Fred B. Kotler of Cornell University, that conclusion is “simplistic and inaccurate.” It fails to account for the fact that labor costs are a small percentage of total project costs, and ignores the fact that higher-paid workers are often higher-skilled workers who find efficiencies and make fewer errors, resulting in fewer expensive change orders. “Construction workers’ wages should be factored into the overall value of the state’s investment in economic development projects,” Kotler wrote. “The prevailing wage law is itself an economic stimulus and can reasonably be considered as part of a broader economic development strategy for the state.”

According to the Economic Policy Institute, for every $1 spent under prevailing-rate laws, $1.50 is generated for our local economies. When workers earn more, they are able to spend more. Wage protections promote a more localized workforce, ensuring that Long Island residents benefit from our economic development investments. It is clear that holding public construction projects to prevailing rate standards brings wealth into communities. This, in turn, creates the virtuous cycle of local consumption and revenue for public services.

…

John R. Durso is president of the Long Island Federation of Labor, representing 250,000 members of 160 AFL-CIO local unions, and president of Local 338 RWDSU/UFCW, which represents 15,000 working men and women in the retail and health care industries.

(Read More)

Nassau legislators unanimously back Albany prevailing wage effort (NY)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

In a bipartisan move, the county’s lawmakers endorse efforts to pay union wages and benefits to construction workers on building projects that receive tax breaks.

By James T. Madore
Updated May 24, 2019 7:45 PM

The Nassau County Legislature has unanimously backed a move in Albany to pay union wages and benefits to construction workers on building projects that receive tax breaks.

The endorsement comes as supporters and opponents of the higher rate, known as the prevailing wage, attempt to reach a compromise before the State Legislature ends its regular session on June 19.

The endorsement also is a rare show of bipartisanship in Mineola and provides a boost to unions that say real estate developers should be compelled to pay the prevailing wage on projects that win taxpayer aid from state or local governments.

…

The prevailing wage bill “will ensure that the taxpayer-funded subsidies we are using to spur development also create strong, middle-class jobs for Long Island construction workers,” the Nassau lawmakers said in a May 8 letter to state Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins (D-Yonkers).

“It’s no secret that Long Island is an expensive place to live, and in Nassau County, the wages this legislation will codify give construction workers a quality of life they wouldn’t otherwise have,” states the letter signed by Presiding Officer Richard J. Nicolello (R-New Hyde Park), Minority Leader Kevan Abrahams (D-Freeport) and 17 other county lawmakers.

…

Under current state law the prevailing wage must be paid to all workers, union and nonunion, on government-funded public-works projects such as roads, mass transit and schools. But that wage rate is not required for those employed on private construction projects aided by industrial development agencies or the state.

(Read More)

Parr: Prevailing wage bill will stop money from leaving New York (NY)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

By Ron Parr
April 15, 2019

New York faces a statewide problem related to public works. Despite what some may say, if this issue is left unresolved it could have disastrous implications for business, hurting both contractors and workers in New York State.

The lack of a clear definition of public works has created a loophole that can be exploited by bad actors to take millions in public subsidies, turn around and hire out of state contractors and pay workers poverty-level wages. The consequences for New York are vast. Tax dollars meant to invest in local companies and spur economic development are funneling into the back pockets of unscrupulous developers and millions in foregone tax revenue continues to accrue.

Legislation in both houses of the state Legislature in Albany would provide the statewide solution New York needs – from Western New York to New York City, from the North Country to Long Island.

Opponents claim public works legislation would increase the cost of construction and impede economic growth, but when you look at the numbers, this is far off the mark. Far from slowing economic growth, public works legislation would significantly boost the economy both upstate and down, first and foremost: through tax revenue.

Mandating wage standards and taxpayer benefits on projects that received public funding would produce an additional $3.5-6.9 million annual sales tax revenue. At present, local contractors lose out in the bidding process to out-of-state contractors that pay poverty-level wages to gain a competitive advantage. Leveling the playing field so that in-state contractors can compete would ensure these tax dollars stay in New York.

Additionally, the payment of prevailing wages often encourages a more skilled, localized workforce. Skilled workers minimize costs by increasing efficiency and decreasing the amount of time needed to complete a project. A clear definition of public works has the potential to actually reduce overall project costs.

Furthermore, public works legislation would strengthen industries outside of construction including insurance, financial services, health care and the restaurant industry, the combination of which would add billions in revenue and produce thousands of jobs.

(Read More)

unnamed

Prevailing-wage bill would uplift construction workers of color (NY)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

April 30, 2019 12:00 AM
Barrie Smith

All construction workers in New York-union or nonunion, male or female, black or white-deserve the right to a fair wage for their hard work.

That’s why all New York construction workers critically need prevailing wage legislation. A loophole in the current definition of public works allows bad-actor contractors to receive millions in taxpayer subsidies for projects while paying workers poverty-level wages.

Despite the universal applicability of this legislation to construction workers, a misinformed narrative that prevailing-wage legislation would negatively impact people of color by favoring union labor somehow persists-often perpetuated by white, nonunion workers. This argument shows a fundamental misunderstanding of how to best serve the interest of people of color, a complete lack of knowledge regarding the increasingly positive role of the building trades in the effort for civil rights in New York, and, frankly, a rudimentary understanding of the bill itself.

Lack of diversity in the building trades is a thing of the past. The social justice community accepts this as fact. The truth is that today, people of color benefit from greater opportunity for higher wages and benefits, a lower racial wage gap and less wage discrimination than in nonunion construction.

The numbers clearly back this up. A 2017 report by the Economic Policy Institute, Diversity in the New York City Union and Nonunion Construction Sectors, showed that more than half of unionized construction workers are people of color. Black workers in particular have a 5% higher share of employment than in the nonunion sector.

And not only are there more jobs for people of color in unions, but the jobs are better. Black workers earn 36.1% more per hour than those in the nonunion sector. Hispanic workers earn $8 more per hour.

(Read More)

unnamed

ATTORNEY GENERAL’S LEGISLATION STRENGTHENING WAGE THEFT LAWS AND INCREASING PENALTIES PASSES LEGISLATURE WITH BIPARTISAN SUPPORT (WA)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

By Washington State Office of the Attorney General
Apr 19th, 2019

OLYMPIA – The Legislature passed Attorney General Bob Ferguson’s agency request legislation strengthening Washington’s wage theft laws in the prevailing wage arena. Prevailing wage is most common in government contracts. Prevailing wage laws prevent a “race to the bottom” as contractors seek to lower worker pay in order to underbid each other.

The bill, SB 5035, increases the maximum penalty for prevailing wage violations from one thousand dollars or 20 percent of the violation, whichever is greater, to five thousand dollars or 50 percent of the violation, whichever is greater. These penalties have not increased since 1985.

Ferguson’s legislation also closes a major loophole in Washington’s prevailing wage laws that allows repeat and willful violators to avoid a penalty or sanction if they respond to a wage complaint by returning the stolen pay to the worker before the state can take additional legal action. This loophole derives from the state’s limited authority to file enforcement actions when there are “unpaid wages” – a term that was undefined before now.

…

“This bill ensures that employers who cheat their workers out of hard-earned pay will face consequences, the same as you or I would face if we stole something,” said Ferguson. “Allowing the state to pursue penalties against employers that intentionally rip off their workers protects hardworking Washingtonians and their families.”

…

The Washington Building Trades, Faith Action Network and Working Washington also supported SB 5035.

(Read More)

Mail haulers in Alabama owed $329,057 in back pay (AL)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

Posted Apr 22, 5:03 PM
By Leada Gore

A Florida-based contractor will pay back wages and benefits to postal delivery personnel in Montgomery.

The payment comes after an investigation into St. Augustine, Florida-based Postal Fleet Services Inc. by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division.

Postal Fleet Services will pay $329,057 in back wages and benefits to 53 employees for violations of requirements of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and the McNamara-O’Hara Service Contract Act, the labor department said.

“No federal contractor should gain an economic advantage by paying employees below the prevailing wages and fringe benefits their contract requires,” said Wage and Hour Regional Administrator Juan Coria. “Federal service contracts spell out employers’ responsibilities when they bid on these jobs. Violations like these can be avoided.”

(Read More)