Does ‘right to work’ imperil the right to health? The effect of labour unions on workplace fatalities

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

Michael Zoorob
Department of Government, Harvard University

Abstract

Objective – Economic policies can have unintended consequences on population health. In recent years, many states in the USA have passed ‘right to work’ (RTW) laws which weaken labour unions. The effect of these laws on occupational health remains unexplored. This study fills this gap by analysing the effect of RTW on occupational fatalities through its effect on unionisation.

Methods – Two-way fixed effects regression models are used to estimate the effect of unionisation on occupational mortality per 100,000 workers, controlling for state policy liberalism and workforce composition over the period 1992-2016. In the final specification, RTW laws are used as an instrument for unionisation to recover causal effects.

Results – The Local Average Treatment Effect of a 1% decline in unionisation attributable to RTW is about a 5% increase in the rate of occupational fatalities. In total, RTW laws have led to a 14.2% increase in occupational mortality through decreased unionisation.

Conclusion – These findings illustrate and quantify the protective effect of unions on workers’ safety. Policymakers should consider the potentially deleterious effects of anti-union legislation on occupational health.

(Read More)

(PDF Copy of Report)

unnamed

So-called ‘right to work’ is an attack on workers (AK)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

Posted June 26, 2018 06:10 am
By Dave Reaves

Have you ever had a bad day at work? It happens to all of us once in a while. Back in the days before organized labor and higher work standards people suffered at their jobs because of unsafe conditions, long hours, no training and poor benefits. Workers got hurt and were literally thrown out into the gutters, lost jobs with no notice, and had no pensions after years of toiling away.

As a nation, we’ve come a long way since the 1800s, but the effort to preserve workers’ rights is constant. Decent jobs with fair wages and benefits provide stability to our communities over the long haul. I am talking about our spouses, children, relatives and friends, people who contribute to the local economy every day.

Occasionally I hear people say, “unions were important years ago, but we just don’t need them anymore.” I couldn’t disagree more. Decades ago, when unions were at their peak, many more Americans had good pensions, good employer health care, job security and living wages. Unions have been at the forefront of every economic justice issue in America for the last 100 years: Medicare, Social Security, workers’ compensation laws, minimum wage and overtime laws, worker safety laws, and much more.

Unions have been the strongest – and often the only – counterbalance to the extraordinary attacks we’ve seen on the middle class. But after decades of unrelenting attacks on unions by the rich and powerful, those things we used to consider fundamental to the American dream are increasingly rare. These attacks on unions have unfortunately been quite successful, and the results have been all too predictable: a massive transfer of money from the middle class and poor to the top 1 percent. Think about this staggering fact: the Walton family, which owns Wal-Mart, controls a fortune equal to the wealth of the bottom 42 percent of Americans combined.

…

Dave Reaves is the business manager for Local 1547. IBEW Local 1547 represents more than 4,000 workers in the state of Alaska.

(Read More)

Delaware legislature strikes down county-by-county Right to Work efforts (DE)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

Delaware House passes bill stalling the state’s anti-labor movement

(PR NewsChannel) / June 26, 2018 / DOVER, Del.

Last week, Delaware legislators passed a pivotal bill stopping the state GOP’s Right to Work movement in its tracks.

Approved by a vote of 25-13 along party lines, the Delaware House voted to guarantee the right of private employers to enter into labor deals that require their employees to join a union. The bill effectively blocks the GOP effort to pass the controversial legislation on a county-by-county or town-by-town basis.

“The Governor strongly believes that one of the best ways to stand up for Delaware’s workers is to protect their right to organize, earn a good living and support their families,” said Jon Starkey, spokesman for Gov. John Carney.

Labor supporters agree, citing the number of states suffering under Right to Work as reason why legislators in Delaware made the right decision.

“Implementing Right to Work is attempting to put out a fire with gasoline,” said Richard Dalton, business manager for the International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE) Local 18 in Ohio. “Business owners will prosper while workers remain unchanged, possibly even worse off than before.”

Studies conducted over the last decade have repeatedly shown Right to Work to have little impact on a state’s economy.

In 2011, the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) conducted a multi-part study. Their first major finding was that, on average, full-time workers in Right to Work states earned 3.1% less than those in unionized states. That same year, New Hampshire and Indiana’s legislature considered implementing a new law. Indiana passed Right to Work while New Hampshire didn’t receive enough support. Although New Hampshire’s economy was stronger from the start, Right to Work did nothing to close the performance gap with Indiana.

A study in 2017 expanded upon EPI’s research to find that Right to Work harms job growth and union performance as well.

(Read More)

A Missouri ‘right-to-work’ law is more likely to harm black workers, who are more likely to be covered by a union contract than other workers (MO)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

Fact Sheet * By Valerie Wilson and Julia Wolfe * May 15, 2018

The phrase “right-to-work” (RTW) refers to laws that prohibit unions from collecting any fees from nonunion members in a bargaining unit despite the fact that these nonmembers are covered by-and thus would still receive the benefits of-the union contract. These benefits include the right to have the union provide costly legal representation should a worker in the bargaining unit find it necessary to file a grievance against his or her employer. Contrary to how the phrase sounds, RTW laws actually restrict the rights of workers by cutting the financial support going to unions, thus limiting the ability of unions to help workers bargain for better wages, benefits, and working conditions.

Currently, 28 states, predominantly in the Midwest, South, and Southwest, have right-to-work laws in place. Later this year, voters in Missouri will decide whether to adopt a new RTW law approved by the state’s general assembly last year.

This fact sheet illustrates the disproportionate impact that a Missouri RTW law could have on African American workers, by highlighting the group’s strong representation among unionized workers in Missouri. This analysis is based on union membership data available from the Current Population Survey (conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau for the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics) for 2010-2017, the period since the end of the Great Recession

In national studies that control for other factors than can influence wages statewide, including the cost of living, wages are still at least 3 percent lower in RTW states than in non-RTW states. While Missouri workers of every race will likely see the negative impacts of an RTW law, black Missourians would be disproportionately harmed by this right-to-work law. That is because black workers are more likely to be covered by a union contract (“unionized”) than other workers. As shown in Figure A, in Missouri, 13.9 percent of all black workers are unionized, compared with 10.3 percent of all white workers, and 9.3 percent of all Hispanic workers. Within the private sector alone, 10.5 percent of black workers, 8.0 percent of white workers, and 9.0 percent of Hispanic workers are covered by a union contract. Black Missourians’ participation in private-sector unions is slightly higher than participation by black workers in the private sector nationwide (9.4 percent)

(Read More)

State lawmakers should avoid any right-to-work proposal like the plague (OH)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

Brigid Kelly, Opinion contributor
Published 12:00 p.m. ET Jan. 3, 2018

While everyone is getting into the holiday spirit of giving, a colleague of mine in the Ohio House is circulating six dangerous and divisive amendments to our Constitution. Amendments that would only take away from working families.

These radical changes to the Ohio Constitution and anti-family ideas are corroded with the fingerprints of the billionaire Koch brothers and anti-American propaganda organizations Americans for Prosperity and the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). These special interest groups are driven by greed and power. It makes absolutely no sense that people with that much money would spend so much time, effort and resources trying to deprive working people of food on their table, roofs over their heads, and day-to-day dignity and security.

The six proposed amendments to the Ohio Constitution are all related to a nefarious and deceptive concept known as “right to work.” Time and time again, we’ve seen that right-to-work experiment leads to lower wages, more injuries and deaths in the workplace and employees are stripped of their voice and rights. But failed experiments don’t seem to get in the way of destructive ideology.

The bottom line is this: lawmakers elected by Ohio citizens should not sign on to an agenda directed by out-of-state special interests who don’t care about the people we are elected to serve.

We’ve been down this road before. In 2011, the out-of-state interests pushed lawmakers to ramrod Senate Bill 5 through the process in order to deny employees of their collective bargaining rights. We successfully fought back by collecting 1.3 million signatures, amassing 17,000 volunteers and vetoing SB 5 by a 62-38 percent margin. In 2011, SB 5 was unfair, unsafe and hurt us all. Today is no different.

(Read More)

Sussex County Council defeats right-to-work ordinance (DE)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

Officials site potential legal costs and lack of authority to enact measure

By Ron MacArthur
January 9, 2018

Sussex County Council voted 4-1 to deny a proposed right-to-work ordinance. The action follows a prolonged Jan. 2 public hearing as well as testimony during public comment periods over the past three months since the ordinance was introduced.

Union members have attended every meeting since introduction and protested against the ordinance Jan. 2 and Jan. 9 on The Circle in Georgetown.

At its Jan. 9 meeting, county attorney J. Everett Moore reiterated his stand that Sussex County Council does not have the right to enact an ordinance under the state’s home-rule statute. Moore spoke for nearly a half-hour providing background leading to his legal
opinion that only the Delaware General Assembly has that right.

After Moore’s presentation, Councilman Rob Arlett, R-Frankford, said there was a lot of information to digest. “It makes sense to defer based on what you just said. It’s a big decision,” he said, offering a motion to defer.

That drew jeers from the crowded council chambers.

Arlett, who introduced the ordinance as a potential economic development measure, failed to get a second on his motion. Arlett was the only councilman to vote in favor of the ordinance during the subsequent vote.

Council agreed that the cost of defending potential legal action in state and federal courts would impact the county’s budget, and could lead to the county losing its insurance company in the future. The four councilmen opposed to the ordinance agreed with Moore’s legal opinion.

(Read More)

(IL) governor candidate Bob Daiber talks prevailing wage, right to work

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

Prevailing wage, PLAs supported

By Kelsey Schulz
POSTED ON JANUARY 29, 2018

WOOD RIVER – Bob Daiber expressed his support of prevailing wage and project labor agreements, as well as his opposition to “right to work” laws, during a press conference in Wood River Monday.

Speaking at the Carpenters Union Hall, 277 E. Madison Ave., the Democratic candidate for the governor touched on those topics and more in front of a crowd that included 19 local labor leaders.

“As many of you know I’ve been a strong advocate for organized labor my entire political career,” said Daiber, who is also the Madison County Regional Superintendent of Schools. “I’m here today as a candidate for governor to continue my ongoing pledge to labor that we can move forward in this state collectively with good paying jobs.”

…

On prevailing wage: “I support prevailing wages, I always have. There’s no place in the workplace to drive down wages. If we do away with prevailing wages in the state then we are going to be competing with as to who as a worker is going to work for less and that is not a place that we want to go. When we have good jobs in the state that are based on prevailing wage we have workers that are being able to make a living wage and are less dependant upon the state for benefits and that’s the direction I want to move Illinois.”

On project labor agreements: “The project labor agreements are simply agreements between labor and management that help get jobs done on time, on budget with no shutdowns and workers being able to go to work each and every day without any work stoppages.”

On right to work: “Last year, I signed a pledge saying ‘no’ to right to work (for less) in the state of Illinois, because I am an advocate for collective bargaining both in the public and private sectors. As governor, I will sit down with AFSCME at the table and we will work out a contract for all state workers in Illinois because they too deserve to have good paying jobs and benefits.”

(Read More)

“Right-to-Work” Laws in the Midwest Have Reduced Unionization and Lowered Wages

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

Published by Frank Manzo IV, MPP
APRIL 3, 2017

Recent “right-to-work” laws have had negative consequences for many workers in Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin, according to a new study by researchers at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and the Illinois Economic Policy Institute.

The analysis focuses on labor markets in six Midwest states from 2010 through 2016. Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin all enacted “right-to-work” (RTW) laws during this period, providing a regional experiment on the effects of the laws. Three neighboring states- Illinois, Minnesota, and Ohio- serve as a comparison group because they did not have RTW laws at the beginning of the time frame and still do not have RTW today.

As of 2016, there were significant differences between the two groups of states. Notably, workers in Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin earned 8% less per hour on average than their counterparts in Illinois, Minnesota, and Ohio.

(Read More)

(See PDF of Study Here)

Ky. Legislative update (KY)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

By State Rep. Chris Harris
JANUARY 9, 2017

I fought hard during this first week of the 2017 session of the Kentucky General Assembly to protect the interests of Kentucky’s working families against a rising tide of wealthy corporate interests, but in the end, our best efforts were blocked by the new ruling majority in the Kentucky House of Representatives. This week will go down in Kentucky history as one of the most damaging to working people.

Never before in modern times has a legislative session been used to do so much harm in so little time with so few opportunities for public input or debate. No time was wasted by Republican majorities in the House and the Senate to repeal prevailing wage standards in the construction of public projects and to enact what I call “right to work for less” legislation. These measures – affecting thousands of working families in Kentucky, both union and non-union – passed despite our strong objections and repeated attempts to slow the process long enough to let the voices of the people be heard during the legislative process.

Numerous studies and overwhelming data show workers’ wages go down when so-called “right to work” legislation, is passed. There’s a long list of other ills associated with right to work states – less health insurance coverage, poor workplace safety records, and less per capita spending on education, to name a few.

Repealing prevailing wage standards also lowers wages for building and tradesmen, like electricians, pipe fitters, plumbers, and steamfitters employed in public construction projects. These repeals also negatively affect the quality of construction and encourage out-of-state, fly-by-night contractors with employees of questionable training, skills and citizenship.

(Read More)

Podcast: “Right-to-Work” Regulations and Unions

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

The Illinois Update
DECEMBER 5, 2016

Episode 3 of For A Living focuses on “right-to-work” laws. The podcast is available on iTunes and on SoundCloud.

What are so-called “right-to-work” laws? What is the historical background of these laws? What are their policy implications for the working class? Where are current political and legal battles occurring?

Professor Robert Bruno, Professor Emily E. LB Twarog, and I are joined by Dale Pierson, a Chicago-area labor lawyer who has served as General Counsel of the International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE) Local 150 since 2002, to answer these questions.

Thanks for listening!

For A Living is an educational podcast jointly provided by the Illinois Economic Policy Institute and the Project for Middle Class Renewal at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

(Read More)