If you want a construction project finished on time without worker shortages, hire a unionized crew, a new report says

Juliana Kaplan
May 10, 2022

  • Unionized construction jobs tend to offer better pay, benefits, and training opportunities.
  • A new report found nonunion firms have more trouble hiring, and are more likely to see project delays.
  • While construction is more unionized than the national average, the majority is still nonunion.

Like businesses across the country, construction contractors say they’re dealing with a labor shortage.

Despite rising wages, the Associated Builders and Contractors said the industry still needs nearly 650,000 workers after3.2% of the workforce quit in March 2022, the second-highest rate since the Bureau of Labor Statistics began measuring it. Amidst a hot real estate market, employers struggle to hire enough workers to keep up.

“The construction worker shortage has reached crisis level,” Home Builder Institute president and CEO said in November 2021.

But the authors of a new report from the Illinois Economic Policy Institute (ILEPI) and Project for Middle Class Renewal (PMCR) at the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign argue that the labor supply crunch is nothing new. There is, however, one factor that seems to make the difference in whether contractors can keep their workers and finish projects on time: If their workers are unionized.

“Union contractors are significantly less likely to have delays in completion times due to shortages of workers — and they’ve actually been more likely to add workers in this tight labor market,” Frank Manzo IV, the executive director of ILEPI and co-author of the report, told Insider.

Manzo, PMCR director Robert Bruno, and PMCR fellow Larissa Petrucci analyzed the results of the Associated General Contractors of America (AGC) surveys from 2018 to 2021. The annual survey polls about 2,000 firms on what’s happening in the world of construction labor; beginning in 2018, the survey broke out specific data from union and nonunion contractors.

The results: Nonunion contractors were 16% more likely to say they had difficulty filling open roles than union contractors. They were also 21% more likely to see their project completion delayed because of worker shortages, and 13% more likely to lose craft workers to other industries.

“Union contractors have been significantly less likely to be losing their workers to other industries. So the non-union side is losing their workers to other industries at much higher rates than the union side,” Manzo said. “That’s because the union segment of the industry offers competitive annual earnings, health insurance coverage, retirement benefits, all of which rival bachelor’s degrees.”

(Read More)

(See PDF Copy of Report)

teamwork-606818_1280

Labor woes must be addressed to solve California’s housing crisis (CA)

Scott Littlehale, Guest Columnist
Published 3:47 p.m. PT – March 5, 2019

If you are concerned about California’s housing affordability crisis, remember these three numbers – 15, 33, and 200,000.

Fifteen is the percentage of total residential project costs consumed by construction labor. The other 85% is the stuff really driving up the cost of your homeland acquisition: Zoning, permitting, environmental compliance and related costs.

Thirty-three (percent) is how much less, on average, residential construction workers earn compared to construction workers who build our commercial facilities and public works.

Put in perspective: The last time California produced housing quantities similar to what Governor Newsom is calling for today – the 1970s – there was no wage gap between residential and non-residential construction work.

Two hundred thousand is the minimum number of new residential construction workers that California needs – under current levels of labor productivity – in order to build enough new housing units to keep our affordability crisis from getting worse.

Obviously, if you want to build more housing units, the last number is the most concerning. Construction is one of the nation’s most dangerous occupations. The industry’s jobs are amongst the most economically volatile – often the first to go during cyclical downturns and recession. Employers must be willing to offset these risks with higher compensation to attract new workers.

But most are not.

Recent research shows that the cost of living adjusted compensation for California construction workers ranks now 46th among US states. One in six construction workers faces some form of wage theft. Residential construction workers earn 24% less per year than other jobs on average, and more than half do not get health insurance at work.

Complicating matters for the housing industry is that there are no longer any shortcuts available to meet its labor force needs. The nation is near full employment, net immigration flows have been negative since 2005 and California’s population of young men without a college degree is shrinking.

(Read More)

Could Gov. Newsom’s ambitious housing goals be sidelined by a worker shortage? (CA)

Labor think tank says California would need at least 200,000 new construction workers

By LEONARDO CASTAÑEDA
PUBLISHED: January 14, 2019

Gov. Gavin Newsom has said he wants to build as many as 3.5 million new houses by 2025 to solve California’s housing crisis.

But those ambitious goals could be derailed without hundreds of thousands of new construction workers needed to dramatically accelerate the pace of California home building, even assuming that cities agree to zone for more housing and there’s money available to build it all. And it’s hard to imagine, given recent trends, where that many additional workers in the low-wage, high-risk industry would come from.

Newsom took an early stab at the money question in his first budget, offering $500 million in state funding for middle-income housing, But he wants California’s companies to take on a bigger role funding new homes. And he said he’s already talked with some Silicon Valley tech companies who are open to cooperating.

Ramping up housing construction from about 100,000 units in 2016 to 1980s levels – about 300,000 new homes were built in 1986 – would require some 200,000 new workers, according to the researcher behind a new study for Smart Cities Prevail, a pro-union nonprofit. But even that influx of workers wouldn’t be enough to meet the goal of 500,000 new houses a year that Newsom floated during his campaign.

“Workers are not going to fall out of trees,” researcher Scott Littlehale said.

Littlehale’s study found that California housing construction isn’t just failing to attract new workers. It’s losing the workers it already has, many of whom are low wage and lower-skilled.

From 2006 to 2017, California lost about 200,000 construction workers. And within the construction trade, many workers are opting for commercial building jobs, which pay more, have better benefits and steadier work.

During the boom building years, the construction industry was “dependent on young workers without a college degree and on immigrant workers,” Littlehale said. Today, both populations are on the decline.

(Read More)

(View PDF of Study – Rebuilding California: The Golden State’s Housing Workforce Reckoning)

Prevailing wage and collective bargaining boost labor market competitiveness and productivity

  • The housing industry currently lacks the wage competitiveness and career training pipeline needed to offset the physical and economic risks of construction. This is hindering its ability to attract and retain the workers needed to increase production of new units.
  • Prevailing Wage standards and collective bargaining agreements are consistently associated with higher wages, increased apprenticeship enrollment, more production efficiency, and fewer workplace safety problems.
  • Most peer reviewed studies have concluded prevailing wage has no significant effect on overall project costs.

Housing builders’ reservoir of low-wage, less-skilled labor is not refilling itself. Background regulations that promote labor-management cooperation around the vital elements of skilled construction workforce development can play a vital role in restoring California residential building to the production engine that it once was.

(Executive Summary)

(Rebuilding California – Video)

California needs 200K construction workers to help affordability (CA)

by Steve Randall
20 Jan 2019

The lack of housing supply has multiple factors including the cost of borrowing and materials; but a shortage of labor is also a major factor in many areas.

In California, the Housing and Community Development Department has said that the sector needs improved productivity to tackle housing affordability. But a new study says there is a key barrier to this – a workforce shortage.

Smart Cities Prevail, a construction industry-focused non-profit, says that the residential construction industry in California must do more to attract the 200,000 workers it needs to meet the ambitious goal to improve affordability.

“The data shows residential construction work is more dangerous, economically risky, and lower paying than most other jobs in our economy,” said study author Scott Littlehale. “When you consider these dynamics alongside the industry’s aging workforce, its failure to institutionalize investments in apprenticeship training, and a shrinking supply of young workers and immigrants, it is clear why the housing sector is struggling to attract the new workers it needs.”

Littlehale found residential construction workers earn 24% less per year than all other jobs on average, and less than half have health insurance coverage through their employer. This is exacerbated by a typically longer commute.

(Read More)