IDOL Reminds Local Governments They No Longer Need to Approve Prevailing Wage Ordinances (IL)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

Published May 11, 2020

SPRINGFIELD – The Illinois Department of Labor (IDOL) wants to remind local units of governments that while they still must pay prevailing wages for public works projects, a 2019 change in the law means they no longer need to adopt a prevailing wage ordinance or file it with IDOL.

“While most local governments are aware of the change, some continue to adopt prevailing wage ordinances and attempt to file them with the Illinois Department of Labor. That is no longer a requirement,” said IDOL Director Michael Kleinik.

The enactment of Public Act 100-1177, which took effect June 1, 2019, relieves local units of government from the former requirement of passing a prevailing wage ordinance, publishing it and filing it with the Illinois Department of Labor.

The prevailing wage schedules for each county in the state are now ascertained by IDOL and published on its website.

The changes to the Prevailing Wage Act also required IDOL to create an electronic database of certified payrolls where contractors will submit certified payrolls directly online rather than filing them with the local government.

Here is a link to the current prevailing wage rates for Illinois counties: https://www2.illinois.gov/idol/Laws-Rules/CONMED/Pages/Rates/2020/March-Rates.aspx

(Read More)

Governor Newsom Signs Executive Order Regarding Workers’ Compensation Presumption For Certain COVID-19 Related Claims (CA)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

May 15, 2020

Under the California Workers’ Compensation Act (“the Act”), employers must carry workers’ compensation insurance for employee injuries or illnesses which “arise out of and in the course of” employment. The Act, first passed in 1911 and amended over the years by the Legislature, provides a comprehensive system for administering claims, including the provision of disability benefits and the payment for associated medical expenses for work-related injuries.

Now comes the COVID-19 pandemic and a panoply of emergency orders by governors across the country. On May 6, 2020, Governor Newsom signed Executive Order #N-62-20 which creates a presumption that any COVID-19-related illness of an employee shall be presumed to arise out of and in the course of the employment for purposes of awarding workers’ compensation benefits if certain conditions are met.
Those conditions include the following:

  1. The employee tested positive for or was diagnosed with COVID19 within 14 days after a day that the employee performed labor or services at the employee’s place of employment at the employer’s direction;
  2. The day referenced in subparagraph (a) on which the employee performed labor or services at the employee’s place of employment at the employer’s direction was on or after March 19, 2020;
  3. The employee’s place of employment referenced in subparagraphs (a) and (b) was not the employee’s home or residence; and
  4. Where subparagraph (a) is satisfied through a diagnosis of COVID-19, the diagnosis was done by a physician who holds a physician and surgeon license issued by the California Medical Board, and that diagnosis is confirmed by further testing within 30 days of the date of the diagnosis.

Thus, the Governor has taken the extraordinary step of presuming a workplace injury without specific evidence of job-causation. While the scope and legality of the new Executive Order may be subject to challenge, it is incumbent upon the California employer to review and enforce workplace safety, in all areas, and to specifically protect against the risk of employee exposure to a communicable disease, thereby avoiding added liability and costs associated with job illness or injury claims.

(Read More)

dispatcher-12

Civil procedure – jurisdiction (IL)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

Where an employee is hired to perform labor for public works covered by the Prevailing Wage Act, they retain the right of action from the act even if their contract does not contain the provision guaranteeing them prevailing wage in contravention of the act.

Posted May 7, 2020 9:54 AM

The 1st District Appellate Court reversed and remanded the decision of Cook County Circuit Judge Margaret Ann Brennan.

The plaintiffs in this case are 12 landscape laborers employed by Moore Landscapes LLC (Moore) as tree planters. Moore had three contracts with the Chicago Parks District for landscaping and related work, each of which contained a standard “prevailing wage rates provision” which mandates that the contractor pay all their employees prevailing wages “if applicable.” It is not disputed that $41.20 is the prevailing wage for landscape related work and the plaintiffs were paid an hourly rate of $18 for their labor. Section 11 of the Prevailing Wage Act (Act) requires all public works to pay the prevailing wage for the labor, and provides a right of action for any laborer who was paid less than the prevailing wage for a contractor doing public works.

The plaintiffs filed suit against Moore in September 2018 seeking unpaid wages, punitive damages, prejudgment interest and reasonable attorney fees and costs. Moore moved to dismiss, arguing their work was exempt from the prevailing wage provisions of the act and citing interpretations by the Illinois Department of Labor. Moore also moved to dismiss under fail to allege facts sufficient to support a claim, asserting the laborers failed to allege facts that supported the inference that the type of labor they performed was covered by the Wage Act. The trial court granted the motion to dismiss. The plaintiffs appealed.

On appeal, Moore argued that, for section 11 of the act to apply, the contract with the laborers must specify that they would be paid prevailing wages, and their contracts had no such provision. The plaintiffs argued that section 11 of the act also mandated that Moore include such a provision, which Moore did not deny, but instead claimed that because there was no contractual stipulation, the plaintiffs had no right of action and must rely on the Department of Labor to enforce any provisions of the act on their behalf. The plaintiffs claimed that the trial court’s interpretation rewards those who issue contracts which violate the act by protecting them from the right of action the act guarantees their employees.

The appellate court agreed with the plaintiffs. The court found that an employer’s failure to adhere to section 4 of the act, which mandates that the contracts include the provision at issue, does not in any way limit an employee’s right of action granted under section 11 of the act for any work where they should have been covered under the act. The appellate court emphasized that to do otherwise would allow employers to avoid liability by failing to adhere to the mandates of the act. The appellate court acknowledged that there is an issue as to whether the labor performed by the plaintiffs was covered under the act, but found that this was a material question of fact suitable for an evidentiary hearing. For that reason, dismissal was inappropriate.

The appellate court therefore reversed and remanded the decision of the circuit court.

Samuel Valerio, et al. v. Moore Landscapes LLC
2020 IL App (1st) 190185
Writing for the court: Justice Bertina E. Lampkin
Concurring: Justices Robert E. Gordon and Eileen O’Neill Burke
Released: March 26, 2020

(Read More)

LYNN WAGE THEFT ADVISORY COMMITTEE: WAGE THEFT ‘IS GOING TO HAPPEN’ (MA)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

BY DAVID MCLELLAN | March 11, 2020

LYNN – There are hundreds of construction workers who are or will be working at Lynn’s many current and future development sites. According to the Lynn Wage Theft Advisory Committee, it’s virtually guaranteed a chunk of them will get ripped off.

“It’s going to happen. It’s a slam dunk. It’s just so easy to get away with,” said Robert Reynolds, a member of the Wage Theft Advisory Committee who gave a talk on wage theft to the Greater Lynn Chamber of Commerce Government Affairs Committee Wednesday morning.

“This is something the whole community has a stake in. This harms everyone,” Reynolds said.

Wage theft is a term that encompasses a variety of legal infractions committed by employers, including failure to pay overtime wages, failure to pay a minimum wage, or otherwise not paying an employee the full amount to which they are legally or contractually entitled.

It harms the workers themselves, but also the larger community, Reynolds said. Tax revenue is lost, workers’ compensation and unemployment funds are lost, and honest businesses are disadvantaged.

According to Reynolds, construction is the No. 1 industry in terms of wage theft prevalence, followed by the food industry. Lynn officials should be paying extra attention to potential wage theft, given the amount of current or upcoming development in the city, he said.

“It’s almost guaranteed that that’s going on at every construction site,” he said. “You want a big banner hanging over the General Edwards Bridge saying, ‘If you’re going to engage in that stuff, we don’t want you here. And if you do engage in that stuff, we’re going to come after you.'”

With the recent increase in development – including at least six major waterfront developments adding thousands of new apartment units – the Wage Theft Advisory Committee is educating the public.

(Read More)

Matthew Fritz-Mauer: The hollow promise of workers’ rights in DC (DC)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

March 4, 2020

It might seem like working people in the District of Columbia have a lot to celebrate. In fact, researchers at Oxfam not long ago named DC the most worker-friendly place in the country. Over the past few years, the DC Council has raised the minimum wage, guaranteed paid sick days, and created a paid family leave program.

But despite these accomplishments, there’s something wrong in our city: Employers frequently violate basic workplace laws, and DC is failing to protect workers’ rights. The name of the problem is wage theft, and it wreaks havoc on the lives of working people. Wage theft occurs when a worker is denied the wages or benefits to which he or she is legally entitled. Common forms include not paying minimum wage or overtime, denying paid leave, and failing to pay for all hours worked.

In too many cases, employers steal from their workers. One study estimated that low-wage workers lose 15% of their income to wage theft; another estimated that nationwide minimum wage violations alone cost low-wage workers $15 billion per year. Across the country, millions of people have their basic workplace rights violated every year.

Research commissioned by the DC Department of Employment Services (DOES) estimates that nearly 40,000 workers per year experience minimum wage violations here in DC. Those of us who work with the low-wage community hear stories of wage theft over and over again. My research, which involves detailed interviews with low-income people, found that wage theft is a persistent and devastating problem in their lives.

Wage theft makes it hard to pay rent, buy food, go to the doctor, and keep on the heat and water. Many workers feel angry, depressed and helpless over it. For some, the strain becomes too much, and they think about or even attempt to die by suicide. Wage theft weakens families and communities, strains the social safety net, and makes it hard for legitimate employers to compete against companies that cut costs by defrauding employees.

How can this be the case? In 2014, DC passed a law specifically designed to attack wage theft. The Wage Theft Prevention Amendment Act increased civil and criminal penalties, expanded the authority of DOES, incentivized lawyers to take on claims, and issued a clear statement about our city’s values. It is one of the most robust and progressive anti-wage theft laws in the country.

But that law is, in many ways, failing.

Today, workers who suffer wage theft have four options: They can go to the DC Office of the Attorney General (OAG), find a private lawyer, file a lawsuit themselves, or file a wage-theft claim with DOES. Realistically, though, DOES has to be the primary enforcer of basic workplace laws. Both the OAG and private-sector attorneys have increased enforcement activities, but resources are limited. The vast majority of people can’t get a lawyer to represent them, and filing a lawsuit on their own is too intimidating and confusing. Going to DOES should be a quick, easy and effective way to fight back against wage theft. In reality, it’s anything but.

(Read More)

Two Florida companies underpaid workers $175,000. Now, one can’t bid on federal contracts (FL)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

BY DAVID J. NEAL
MARCH 05, 2020 06:54 AM

Two Florida electrical contractors paid $175,413 in back wages and fringe benefits to workers after they violated numerous federal guidelines while working on a West Palm Beach apartment building.

The Department of Labor said Monday the back compensation went to 46 workers or $3,813.32 per worker of Tampa’s Southern Integrated Systems and subcontractor West Palm Beach’s J & Brothers Electrical Corp. This all happened while working on Royal Palm Place in West Palm Beach.

Also, Southern is debarred or banned from bidding on federal contracts for three years.

The company run by manager Jason Dinger, according to state of Florida records, didn’t pay electricians overtime when they earned it, Labor said.

On top of that, Southern “submitted falsified certified payroll records that failed to report accurately all the hours employees worked on the project. Although the employees worked overtime every workweek, the certified payroll did not reflect those hours.”

J & Brothers, run by Juan Vincente Escalante, also tried some shucking and jiving with payroll records. Labor’s Wage and Hour Division investigators saw records that said overtime hours had been paid properly, “despite the employer’s admission that they paid their workers at straight-time rates for all the hours that they worked.”

When some workers spent part of the day or week on other projects, J & Brothers didn’t keep a proper record when they were working on the Royal Palm, a federal project – thus requiring paying the area’s prevailing wages and fringe benefits – and when they were on another project. There was no way for J & Brothers to pay employees accurately.

The “prevailing wages” requirement comes from Davis Bacon and Related Acts. Paying straight time for all hours worked, when there should’ve been overtime violates the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (CWHSSA).

(Read More)

Officials want to crack down on employers (LA)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

By David Jacobs The Center Square
Mar 6, 2020

Growth of Louisiana’s unemployment trust fund could lower the tax bills of state employers, though many businesses are not paying their share, officials said Friday.

Many companies avoid paying into the fund by classifying employees as temporary contractors, which gives those businesses an unfair competitive advantage and makes employers who follow the law shoulder more of the unemployment fund costs, said Ava Dejoie, secretary of the Louisiana Workforce Commission.

“It is an unfair advantage and it hurts all of us,” she said.

Employers support the trust fund with taxes on the first $7,700 of each employee’s pay. When the fund reaches $1.15 billion, the taxable wage base falls to $7,000 and unemployment benefits increase. When it hits $1.25 billion, funding for a state program employers can use for worker training increases from $20 million to $35 million, Dejoie said.

While the fund is expected to hit both of those benchmarks over the next 18 months or so, she said, misclassification hurts that progress. The practice also allows companies to reduce their labor costs so they can outbid employers that play by the rules, Dejoie added.

The United States Treasury Department estimated in 2013 that preventing worker misclassification would generate $8.32 billion in federal revenue over 10 years. The Louisiana Legislative Auditor has said misclassification cost Louisiana at least $9 million from 2014 through 2018, though the actual number could be much higher. Over the past two years, the Workforce Commission conducted 19 audits that identified 1,100 misclassified workers and $18.5 million in unreported wages, officials said.

The LWC does not get state tax dollars to support its enforcement efforts. Dejoie said additional funds to hire more auditors and a full-time attorney or two would help.

Louisiana also is the only state in the nation that requires employers that break classification rules to get a warning on their first offense.

(See Article)

New bill targets wage theft by forcing construction managers to foot the bill (NY)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

The legislation seeks to make it easier for workers to recoup wages

By Kathryn Brenzel
March 12, 2020

A new bill seeks to crack down on construction wage theft in New York by shifting more responsibility to construction managers.

The legislation would leave general contractors on the hook for any outstanding wages or benefits owed to subcontractors on a project. Typically, workers can file a lawsuit against their employer – often a subcontractor – to recoup wages. But state legislators feel this leaves too many opportunities for companies to evade paying their workers.

“This is a major issue in the construction industry where, oftentimes, such direct employer is an unscrupulous subcontractor or labor broker willing to hide assets, change corporate identity and take part in other unscrupulous practices to avoid liability and make themselves judgment proof from a wage theft action,” a memo for the bill states.

The memo adds that making the “prime contractor” of a construction project (the company that inks a contract with the owner of a project) liable for the actions of their subcontractors would allow construction workers to collect unpaid wages more quickly and serve as “an incentive for the construction industry to better self-police itself.”

Sen. Jessica Ramos, who is the prime sponsor of the bill alongside Assembly member Marcos Crespo, said she’s been working with Laborers’ International Union of North America on the bill. She hopes the legislation will help hold companies accountable, given that construction is an industry where the hierarchy of labor can sometimes enable companies to defer responsibility. All too often, she said, companies think of construction workers as “disposable.”

“I want you to know what human beings you are employing,” she said.

In January, Gov. Andrew Cuomo vetoed a bill that would have allowed employees of all industries to place a lien against their employers’ assets while a civil action is pending. The legislation was intended to prevent instances where a company or entity dissolves before an employee is able to recoup their wages through court action.

Instead, the governor signed a bill into law that targeted limited liability companies, making the 10 members with the largest ownership interest in such entities responsible for unpaid wages to employees (but without the lien option). …

At the state level, in 2017, the Department of Labor reclaimed $6 million owed to ironworkers and welders from November 2013 to December 2017, marking the largest monetary recovery of its kind at the time. According to Cuomo’s office, the state has recovered nearly $300 million in stolen wages since 2011. The U.S. Department of Labor estimates that $1 billion in wages, across various industries, are stolen each year in New York.

(Read More)

Suffolk County DA: Businesses cheated workers, state (NY)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

Wage and benefit fund theft, wage violations, and fraud in unemployment insurance & workers comp were among alleged crimes, prosecutors say.

Michael DeSantis
March 9, 2020

SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY – Eight people and nine businesses have been charged in a labor-related crackdown in Suffolk County.

The crimes collectively saw the theft of more than $250,000 in employees’ wages and benefits, nonpayment of more than $58,000 to the Department of Labor for unemployment insurance fund contributions, and failure to pay more than $133,000 to the state’s insurance fund for workers’ compensation insurance premiums, prosecutors said. Two defendants also illegally dumped polluted water into a public storm water drain, prosecutors said.

“Here in Suffolk County, we will not tolerate the exploitation of workers or our taxpayers by greedy corporations and business owners,” Suffolk County District Attorney Timothy D. Sini said in a news release. “That is why my Office, along with our partners, is aggressively identifying and prosecuting bad actors in the business community and holding them accountable. Indeed, not only will our efforts protect workers and taxpayers, they will also prevent these bad businesses from gaining an unfair competitive advantage against legitimate, law-abiding businesses.” …

“The Governor and the Department of Labor take the responsibility of enforcing labor and worker protections very seriously,” Roberta Reardon, New York State Department of Labor commissioner, said. “We have zero tolerance for those businesses who seek to defraud the system. Businesses who don’t play by the rules will be held accountable. We are fortunate to have law enforcement partners like the Suffolk County DA’s office to help us reinforce those protections.”

The investigations are ongoing. Sini urges anyone who worked for one of the companies and was underpaid or deprived of his or her wages to contact the Labor Crime Unit at 631-853-4232 or via email to InfoDA@SuffolkCountyNY.gov.

(Read More)

Why Philadelphia Needs a Department of Labor (PA)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

OSCAR PERRY ABELLO
MARCH 3, 2020

Nadia Hewka has been fighting against wage theft pretty much since the day she first came to work at Community Legal Services of Philadelphia – in 1997. Then, the term “wage theft” wasn’t yet the established term. The going phrase at the time was “underpayment of wages.”

“It just doesn’t capture what’s happening,” Hewka says. “People’s labor and hours and time are being stolen when their wages are stolen.”

Wage theft comes in a few different forms. Employers may refuse to pay workers, pay them less than minimum wage, refuse to pay overtime, undercount workers’ hours or otherwise fail to pay workers for hours that qualify as work under the law. Employers may require workers to work before and after their shifts or before or after they have clocked in, without compensation.

All those forms of wage theft are already illegal, by state or federal law, or both. But enforcing those laws has been another story. Enforcing worker rights, from wage theft and beyond, has long depended on victims taking employers to court. Often, employers don’t get caught because not every wage-theft victim has the time and resources to meet with lawyers, give extensive depositions and go through a legal battle in court.

Wage theft most affects low-wage workers. In a landmark 2015 study from the Sheller Center for Social Justice at Temple University Beasley School of Law, which looked at wage theft across Pennsylvania, researchers found that in the five-county Philadelphia metropolitan area alone, every year an estimated 128,476 low-wage workers experienced minimum wage violations, 105,458 experienced overtime nonpayment violations, and 83,344 experienced off-the-clock violations. That report helped fuel the campaign in 2016 to finally make wage theft illegal at the local level in Philadelphia.

(Read More)